Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ACET logo
ACET
FATE logo
FATE
CELC logo
CELC
JPM logo
JPM
KYMR logo
KYMR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACET
Adicet Bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$75M
5Y Perf.-49.6%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$240M
5Y Perf.-94.3%
CELC
Celcuity Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.+1495.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+220.1%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.04B
5Y Perf.+170.2%

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACET logoACET
FATE logoFATE
CELC logoCELC
JPM logoJPM
KYMR logoKYMR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnology
Market Cap$75M$240M$4.32B$896.00B$7.04B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$6M$0.00$280.33B$51M
Net Income (TTM)$-109M$-130M$-193M$57.05B$-315M
Gross Margin53.8%60.0%33.2%
Operating Margin-22.1%25.9%-7.0%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$15M$78M$195M$942.38B$82M
Cash & Equiv.$39M$47M$166M$343.34B$357M

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACET
FATE
CELC
JPM
KYMR
StockAug 20Jun 26Return
Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET)10050.4-49.6%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1005.7-94.3%
Celcuity Inc. (CELC)1001595.5+1495.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100320.1+220.1%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100270.2+170.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Adicet Bio, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. KYMR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ACET
Adicet Bio, Inc.
The Growth Leader

ACET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.

  • 7.2% revenue growth vs CELC's -51.7%
  • +9.3% vs JPM's +21.8%
Best for: growth and momentum
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

FATE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CELC
Celcuity Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CELC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 20.4% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
  • 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.91 vs ACET's 2.08, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACET logoACET7.2% revenue growth vs CELC's -51.7%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
Stability / SafetyKYMR logoKYMRBeta 0.91 vs ACET's 2.08, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACET logoACET+9.3% vs JPM's +21.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs ACET's -65.4%, ROIC 4.5% vs -64.9%

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACETAdicet Bio, Inc.
FY 2017
Human Health
49.4%$315M
Performance Chemicals
25.9%$165M
Pharmaceutical Ingredients
24.7%$157M
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M
CELCCelcuity Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGKYMR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and CELC operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.6%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$6M$0$280.3B$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$108M-$127M-$186M$81.4B-$352M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$109M-$130M-$193M$57.0B-$315M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$92M-$108M-$173M$100.9B-$244M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.8%+60.0%+33.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-22.1%+25.9%-7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-20.6%+20.4%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-17.1%+36.0%-4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.3%+55.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+62.1%+18.8%-12.8%+16.0%+13.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ACET and CELC and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$75M$240M$4.3B$896.0B$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$51M$271M$4.3B$1.50T$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.47x-1.79x-23.43x16.00x-23.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue36.13x3.20x179.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.35x1.18x46.27x2.47x4.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — ACET and CELC and JPM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CELC. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-80.4%-58.9%-2.4%+15.9%-25.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-65.4%-39.4%-50.2%+1.3%-22.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-64.9%-36.5%-80.4%+4.5%-24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-65.7%-43.1%-54.2%+8.9%-27.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922354
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x0.38x1.94x2.60x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$24M$31M$30M$599.0B-$275M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$39M$47M$166M$343.3B$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15M$78M$195M$942.4B$82M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1866.49x-5.27x0.74x-2119.53x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CELC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CELC five years ago would be worth $33,516 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, ACET leads with a +932.2% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CELC at 99.6% vs FATE's -27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.7%+108.1%-11.9%-0.5%+18.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+932.2%+47.1%+605.0%+21.8%+82.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.6%-61.9%+694.9%+138.2%+242.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-31.6%-97.7%+235.2%+118.2%+70.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.8%+15.7%+519.7%+465.8%+159.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.6%-27.5%+99.6%+33.6%+50.8%
CELC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACET's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs CELC's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.08x1.93x1.56x0.94x0.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.47$2.88$151.02$337.25$103.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.46$0.91$11.28$262.71$36.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.0%+71.5%+58.6%+95.1%+83.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.747.832.659.156.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded117K3.2M1.2M7.0M492K
Evenly matched — JPM and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ACET as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", CELC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 167.0% upside for FATE (target: $6) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricACET logoACETAdicet Bio, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…CELC logoCELCCelcuity Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$5.50$153.22$339.75$112.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts1231126126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CELC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACET vs FATE vs CELC vs JPM vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR?

Over the past 5 years, Celcuity Inc.

(CELC) delivered a total return of +235. 2%, compared to -97. 7% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELC returned +519. 7% versus ACET's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Adicet Bio, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning ACET is approximately 128% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -33. 6% for Celcuity Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KYMR leads at -5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 167.

0% to $5. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ACET, FATE, CELC, KYMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ACET or FATE or CELC or JPM or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ACET: -92. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ACET and FATE and CELC and JPM and KYMR?

These companies operate in different sectors (ACET (Healthcare) and FATE (Healthcare) and CELC (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KYMR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ACET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CELC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while ACET, FATE, CELC, KYMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.