Steel
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Financial - Credit Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $127M | $231M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $77M | $340M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $47M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 59.3% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -9.8% | 30.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.9x | 8.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $316M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $202M | $10.27B |
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ascent Industries C… (ACNT) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 370.2 | +270.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACNT vs MFIN vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACNT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 6.72x
- Beta 0.47 vs MFIN's 1.12, lower leverage
MFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.6%
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.6%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs ACNT's 93.7%
- 27.8% margin vs ACNT's 1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ACNT's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs MFIN's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs MFIN's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ACNT's 1.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -6.6% |
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 644.0x ACNT's $77M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACNT's 1.6%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $77M | $340M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $111M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $47M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $126M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +59.3% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +30.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +13.7% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +37.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | +16.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 80% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MFIN's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $127M | $231M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $83M | $346M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.22x | 5.51x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.93x | 8.80x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.94x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 0.65x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 0.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.83x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $1 for ACNT. ACNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFIN scores 7/9 vs ACNT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +9.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.6% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.6% | +17.2% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.0% | +10.0% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.62x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $115M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $202M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $316M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.07x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,545 for ACNT. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs MFIN's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs ACNT's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | -1.1% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +8.6% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.3% | +44.5% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | +25.5% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.7% | +65.9% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.2% | +13.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MFIN's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ACNT's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.12x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.92 | $11.00 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.62 | $7.88 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +89.2% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 62K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MFIN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACNT as "Buy", MFIN as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for ACNT (target: $18) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, MFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.61% vs KO's 2.46%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $10.50 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 9 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.45 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MFIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ACNT vs MFIN vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACNT or MFIN or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to +25. 4% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus MFIN's +65. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Medallion Financial Corp. 's 1. 12β — meaning MFIN is approximately -659% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ascent Industries Co. grew EPS 56. 7% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Medallion Financial Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -7. 5% for Ascent Industries Co. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus -9. 0% for ACNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFIN leads at 96. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACNT or MFIN or KO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACNT: 28. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACNT or MFIN or KO?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
6% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ACNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACNT or MFIN or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MFIN: +65. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACNT and MFIN and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACNT (Basic Materials) and MFIN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. MFIN, KO pay a dividend while ACNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.