Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ACNT logo
ACNT
ZEUS logo
ZEUS
KALU logo
KALU
JPM logo
JPM
RS logo
RS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACNT
Ascent Industries Co.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$127M
5Y Perf.+87.8%
ZEUS
Olympic Steel, Inc.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$533M
5Y Perf.+309.3%
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+158.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$21.13B
5Y Perf.+335.5%

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACNT logoACNT
ZEUS logoZEUS
KALU logoKALU
JPM logoJPM
RS logoRS
IndustrySteelSteelAluminumBanks - DiversifiedSteel
Market Cap$127M$533M$3.09B$896.00B$21.13B
Revenue (TTM)$77M$1.90B$3.70B$280.33B$14.84B
Net Income (TTM)$1M$14M$153M$57.05B$806M
Gross Margin21.8%82.8%10.2%60.0%27.2%
Operating Margin-9.8%1.9%6.6%25.9%7.5%
Forward P/E16.9x20.7x18.5x14.4x21.0x
Total Debt$13M$313M$1.12B$942.38B$1.99B
Cash & Equiv.$58M$12M$7M$343.34B$217M

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACNT
ZEUS
KALU
JPM
RS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Ascent Industries C… (ACNT)100187.8+87.8%
Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS)100409.3+309.3%
Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU)100258.9+158.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Reliance Steel & Al… (RS)100435.5+335.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ACNT and RS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ACNT
Ascent Industries Co.
The Defensive Pick

ACNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 6.72x
  • Beta 0.47, current ratio 6.72x
  • Beta 0.47 vs KALU's 1.86, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ZEUS
Olympic Steel, Inc.
The Value Pick

ZEUS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.49 vs RS's 1.06
Best for: valuation efficiency
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation
The Growth Play

KALU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
  • 11.5% revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9%
  • +148.9% vs ACNT's +10.2%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 21.0x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.06
  • 20.4% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7%
  • 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ZEUS's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
The Long-Run Compounder

RS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 489.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • 7.6% ROA vs ACNT's 1.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs -6.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKALU logoKALU11.5% revenue growth vs ACNT's -57.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 21.0x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.06
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ZEUS's 0.7%
Stability / SafetyACNT logoACNTBeta 0.47 vs KALU's 1.86, lower leverage
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ZEUS's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)KALU logoKALU+148.9% vs ACNT's +10.2%
Efficiency (ROA)RS logoRS7.6% ROA vs ACNT's 1.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs -6.6%

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACNTAscent Industries Co.
FY 2024
Stainless Steel Pipe
54.6%$97M
Specialty Chemicals
45.4%$81M
ZEUSOlympic Steel, Inc.
FY 2024
Carbon Flat Products
57.1%$1.1B
Specialty Metals Flat Products
25.6%$497M
Tubular and Pipe Products
17.3%$336M
KALUKaiser Aluminum Corporation
FY 2025
Packaging
44.2%$1.5B
Aero Hs Products
24.8%$838M
Ge Products
22.5%$759M
Automotive Extrusions
8.5%$286M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
RSReliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
FY 2025
Carbon steel
62.6%$7.9B
Aluminum
19.6%$2.5B
Stainless steel
15.4%$1.9B
Other and eliminations
2.4%$306M

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGRS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3663.4x ACNT's $77M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZEUS's 0.7%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$77M$1.9B$3.7B$280.3B$14.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$45M$368M$81.4B$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M$14M$153M$57.0B$806M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M$42M$24M$100.9B$612M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.8%+82.8%+10.2%+60.0%+27.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.8%+1.9%+6.6%+25.9%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%+0.7%+4.1%+20.4%+5.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.0%+2.2%+0.7%+36.0%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.9%+4.4%+42.4%+15.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.7%-21.7%+183.2%+16.0%+36.4%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ZEUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 46% valuation discount to RS's 29.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZEUS offers better value at 0.58x vs RS's 1.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Market CapShares × price$127M$533M$3.1B$896.0B$21.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$83M$834M$4.2B$1.50T$22.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-24.22x24.29x28.16x16.00x29.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.93x20.72x18.54x14.40x21.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.58x0.93x0.90x1.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.59x13.43x18.36x17.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.69x0.27x0.92x3.20x1.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.56x0.97x3.84x2.47x3.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF127.14x8.88x42.05x
ZEUS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ACNT and RS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KALU delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for ACNT. ACNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACNT scores 6/9 vs RS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.4%+2.4%+18.7%+15.9%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.3%+5.9%+1.3%+7.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.6%+4.3%+7.8%+4.5%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.0%+5.6%+9.4%+8.9%+11.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965655
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.15x0.55x1.36x2.60x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$44M$301M$1.1B$599.0B$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$58M$12M$7M$343.3B$217M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$313M$1.1B$942.4B$2.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.15x4.84x0.74x18.77x
Evenly matched — ACNT and RS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KALU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RS five years ago would be worth $25,934 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,545 for ACNT. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +148.9% total return vs ACNT's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KALU at 42.3% vs ZEUS's 1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.5%+9.1%+59.7%-0.5%+40.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.2%+54.9%+148.9%+21.8%+35.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+41.3%+5.4%+188.2%+138.2%+69.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+25.4%+52.1%+60.3%+118.2%+159.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.7%+96.3%+153.5%+465.8%+489.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.2%+1.8%+42.3%+33.6%+19.3%
KALU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ACNT and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KALU's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RS currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs ACNT's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.47x1.23x1.86x0.94x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.92$52.65$194.43$337.25$417.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.62$27.11$71.44$262.71$260.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.4%+90.9%+98.0%+95.1%+99.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.948.259.659.175.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded73K47233K7.0M275K
Evenly matched — ACNT and RS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACNT as "Buy", ZEUS as "Buy", KALU as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", RS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for ACNT (target: $18) vs -14.3% for ZEUS (target: $41). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs RS's 1.17%.

MetricACNT logoACNTAscent Industries…ZEUS logoZEUSOlympic Steel, In…KALU logoKALUKaiser Aluminum C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …RS logoRSReliance Steel & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$41.00$165.33$339.75$373.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts46226127
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+1.6%+1.9%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1401515
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.57$3.09$5.95$4.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.2%0.0%0.0%+3.9%+2.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ZEUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACNT vs ZEUS vs KALU vs JPM vs RS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Olympic Steel, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 1. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

Over the past 5 years, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) delivered a total return of +159. 3%, compared to +25. 4% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RS returned +489. 2% versus ACNT's +93. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ascent Industries Co.

(ACNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Kaiser Aluminum Corporation's 1. 86β — meaning KALU is approximately 298% more volatile than ACNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.

5% versus -57. 9% for Ascent Industries Co. (ACNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -48. 8% for Olympic Steel, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KALU leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -7. 5% for Ascent Industries Co. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -9. 0% for ACNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 1. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACNT: 28. 1% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield), KALU (1. 6% yield), ZEUS (1. 2% yield), RS (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ACNT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ACNT or ZEUS or KALU or JPM or RS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.

(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 2% yield, +489. 2% 10Y return). Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +489. 2%, KALU: +153. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ACNT and ZEUS and KALU and JPM and RS?

These companies operate in different sectors (ACNT (Basic Materials) and ZEUS (Basic Materials) and KALU (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and RS (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ACNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZEUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ZEUS, KALU, JPM, RS pay a dividend while ACNT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.