Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AURA vs ADVM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AURA vs ADVM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $412M | $96M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-112M | $-204M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -139.2% |
| Total Debt | $17M | $92M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $61M |
AURA vs ADVM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aura Biosciences, I… (AURA) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| Adverum Biotechnolo… (ADVM) | 100 | 18.1 | -81.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AURA vs ADVM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AURA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth -0.6%
- -56.7% 10Y total return vs ADVM's -88.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 8.15x
ADVM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.92
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 5.73x
- Beta 0.92 vs AURA's 1.68
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -19.0% revenue growth vs ADVM's -72.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs ADVM's -130.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs AURA's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.3% vs AURA's -3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -64.1% ROA vs ADVM's -282.3%, ROIC -72.4% vs -124.2% |
AURA vs ADVM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AURA vs ADVM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AURA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AURA and ADVM operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$117M | -$205M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$112M | -$204M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | -$138M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -139.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -130.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -92.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -56.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AURA and ADVM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $412M | $96M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $369M | $127M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.64x | -0.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 96.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AURA leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AURA delivers a -78.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-78 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ADVM. AURA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADVM's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADVM scores 3/9 vs AURA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.1% | -189.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -64.1% | -2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.4% | -124.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.8% | -95.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $61M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $92M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AURA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AURA five years ago would be worth $4,331 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,185 for ADVM. Over the past 12 months, ADVM leads with a +68.3% total return vs AURA's -3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AURA at -20.0% vs ADVM's -34.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.9% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.9% | +68.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | -71.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -88.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -88.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.0% | -34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ADVM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADVM is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AURA's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ADVM currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs AURA's 67.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.54 | $5.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.73 | $2.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.2% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.7 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 549K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AURA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ADVM leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
AURA vs ADVM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AURA or ADVM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aura Biosciences, Inc.
(AURA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AURA or ADVM?
Over the past 5 years, Aura Biosciences, Inc.
(AURA) delivered a total return of -56. 7%, compared to -88. 2% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AURA returned -56. 7% versus ADVM's -88. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AURA or ADVM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.
(ADVM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Aura Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning AURA is approximately 82% more volatile than ADVM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aura Biosciences, Inc. (AURA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 130% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AURA or ADVM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aura Biosciences, Inc.
grew EPS -0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -227. 7% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AURA or ADVM?
Aura Biosciences, Inc.
(AURA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -130. 9% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AURA leads at 0. 0% versus -139. 2% for ADVM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADVM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AURA or ADVM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AURA or ADVM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc.
(ADVM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Aura Biosciences, Inc. (AURA) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADVM: -88. 2%, AURA: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AURA and ADVM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.