Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Bank of Montreal (BMO) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WFC | 8.7% revenue growth vs BMO's -0.5% |
| Value | BMO | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 11.6x), PEG 1.17 vs 2.07 |
| Quality / Margins | WFC | 15.7% net margin vs BMO's 11.1% |
| Stability / Safety | BMO | Beta 0.66 vs WFC's 1.04 |
| Dividends | BMO | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WFC's 1.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BMO | +44.5% vs WFC's +6.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WFC | 1.0% ROA vs BMO's 0.6%, ROIC 3.7% vs 1.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Bank of Montreal is a major Canadian diversified financial institution providing banking, wealth management, and capital markets services across North America. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from lending activities (about 60% of total revenue) and non-interest income from capital markets, wealth management, and insurance services. Its competitive advantage stems from its long-established Canadian retail banking franchise—one of the country's "Big Five" banks—with deep customer relationships and extensive branch networks.
Wells Fargo is one of America's largest diversified financial services companies operating primarily through its extensive branch network. It generates revenue from interest income on loans (roughly 60% of total revenue) and non-interest income from fees for banking services, wealth management, and investment banking. Its key competitive advantage is its massive retail banking footprint—with thousands of branches serving millions of customers—which creates a stable deposit base and cross-selling opportunities.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BMO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.4B annually — 1.6x BMO's $78.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (WFC) to 11.1% (BMO).
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78.1B | $125.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.5B | $31.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.1B | $21.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.0B | -$14.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.6% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.4% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, WFC trades at a 12% valuation discount to BMO's 17.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BMO offers better value at 1.99x vs WFC's 2.71x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102.0B | $251.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354.0B | $330.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.22x | 15.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.18x | 11.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.99x | 2.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.29x | 10.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.41x | 82.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WFC delivers a 11.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for BMO. WFC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMO's 4.71x.
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.6% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.71x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $344.9B | $78.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70.3B | $203.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $415.2B | $281.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.30x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WFC five years ago would be worth $23,722 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,707 for BMO. Over the past 12 months, BMO leads with a +44.5% total return vs WFC's +6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WFC at 22.6% vs BMO's 18.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.8% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +84.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.1% | +137.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.9% | +103.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +22.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFC's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BMO currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $149.01 | $97.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $85.40 | $58.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 631K | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BMO as "Buy" and WFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for WFC (target: $100) vs -45.8% for BMO (target: $78). For income investors, BMO offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs WFC's 1.82%.
| Metric | BMOBank of Montreal | WFCWells Fargo & Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $78.00 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.96 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +8.8% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Montreal (BMO) | 100 | 200.36 | +100.4% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 218.34 | +118.3% |
Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) returned +137% over 5 years vs Bank of Montreal (BMO)'s +97%. A $10,000 investment in WFC 5 years ago would be worth $23,722 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Montreal (BMO) | $25.5B | $78.1B | +206.9% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | $94.2B | $125.4B | +33.2% |
Bank of Montreal's revenue grew from $25.5B (2016) to $78.1B (2025) — a 13.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Montreal (BMO) | 18.2% | 11.1% | -38.6% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 23.3% | 15.7% | -32.5% |
Bank of Montreal's net margin went from 18% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Montreal (BMO) | 10.1 | 11.3 | +11.9% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 14.8 | 13.1 | -11.5% |
Bank of Montreal has traded in a 5x–17x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. Wells Fargo & Company has traded in a 10x–74x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank of Montreal (BMO) | 6.92 | 11.44 | +65.3% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 3.99 | 5.37 | +34.6% |
Bank of Montreal's EPS grew from $6.92 (2016) to $11.44 (2025) — a 6% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Bank of Montreal generated $9B FCF in 2025 (-80% vs 2021). Wells Fargo & Company generated $3B FCF in 2024 (+126% vs 2021).
BMO vs WFC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMO or WFC a better buy right now?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) offers the better valuation at 15.2x trailing P/E (11.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank of Montreal (BMO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMO or WFC?
On trailing P/E, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the cheapest at 15.2x versus Bank of Montreal at 17.2x. On forward P/E, Bank of Montreal is actually cheaper at 10.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of Montreal wins at 1.17x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2.07x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMO or WFC?
Over the past 5 years, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) delivered a total return of +137.2%, compared to +97.1% for Bank of Montreal (BMO). A $10,000 investment in WFC five years ago would be worth approximately $24K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BMO returned +227.9% versus WFC's +103.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMO or WFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of Montreal (BMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.66β versus Wells Fargo & Company's 1.04β — meaning WFC is approximately 56% more volatile than BMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 156% versus 5% for Bank of Montreal — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — BMO or WFC?
Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.7% net margin versus 11.1% for Bank of Montreal — meaning it keeps 15.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFC leads at 18.6% versus 14.8% for BMO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFC leads at 62.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BMO or WFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Bank of Montreal (BMO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1.17x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2.07x. A PEG below 1.5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Bank of Montreal (BMO) trades at 10.2x forward P/E versus 11.6x for Wells Fargo & Company — 1.4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 22.8% to $100.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BMO or WFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Bank of Montreal (BMO) offers the highest yield at 3.5%, versus 1.8% for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).
08Is BMO or WFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of Montreal (BMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.66), 3.5% yield, +227.9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMO: +227.9%, WFC: +103.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BMO and WFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.