Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Barfresh Food Group, Inc. (BRFH) vs The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BRFH | 31.9% revenue growth vs COCO's 18.2% |
| Quality / Margins | COCO | 11.7% net margin vs BRFH's -27.4% |
| Stability / Safety | BRFH | Beta 0.46 vs COCO's 0.71 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COCO | +79.0% vs BRFH's -29.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | COCO | 15.5% ROA vs BRFH's -79.8%, ROIC 51.1% vs -232.8% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Barfresh Food Group is a manufacturer and distributor of ready-to-drink and ready-to-blend frozen beverages for the foodservice industry. It generates revenue primarily through sales of its smoothie, shake, and frappe products—which come in bottled, easy-pour, concentrate, and single-serve formats—to schools, restaurants, and other institutional customers. The company's key advantage lies in its proprietary blending systems and portion-controlled formats that simplify beverage preparation while maintaining consistency.
The Vita Coco Company is a leading coconut water brand that develops and markets coconut-based beverages and related products. It generates revenue primarily from coconut water sales — which account for the majority of its business — along with coconut oil, coconut milk, and newer hydration and energy drink lines. The company's moat lies in its strong brand recognition as the dominant player in the coconut water category and its established distribution network across multiple retail channels.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
COCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BRFH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
COCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $610M annually — 55.5x BRFH's $11M. COCO is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRFH's -27.4%. On growth, BRFH holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $610M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $39M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +36.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.7% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.4% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | +62.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.16x | 48.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 42.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.00x | 6.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 68.31x | 10.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COCO delivers a 21.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-147 for BRFH. COCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRFH's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COCO scores 4/9 vs BRFH's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -146.8% | +21.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.8% | +15.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +51.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -173.0% | +27.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.44x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $597,000 | -$184M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $235,000 | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $832,000 | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.55x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in COCO five years ago would be worth $42,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,927 for BRFH. Over the past 12 months, COCO leads with a +79.0% total return vs BRFH's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COCO at 50.9% vs BRFH's 32.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.8% | +8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.2% | +79.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.9% | +243.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.7% | +329.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.4% | +329.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.4% | +50.9% |
Risk & Volatility
BRFH is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COCO's 0.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COCO currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs BRFH's 44.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $59.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.00 | $25.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.2% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 660K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | BRFHBarfresh Food Gro… | COCOThe Vita Coco Com… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH) | 100 | 63.56 | -36.4% |
| The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) | 98.45 | 412.2 | +318.7% |
The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) returned +329% over 5 years vs Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH)'s -51%. A $10,000 investment in COCO 5 years ago would be worth $42,944 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH) | $1M | $11M | +635.3% |
| The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) | $284M | $610M | +114.7% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH) | -7.0% | -26.4% | -277.0% |
| The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) | 3.3% | 11.7% | +252.7% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) | 32.9 | 44.5 | +35.3% |
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. has traded in a 33x–99x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~49x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barfresh Food Group… (BRFH) | -1.39 | -0.19 | +86.3% |
| The Vita Coco Compa… (COCO) | 0.17 | 1.19 | +600.0% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Barfresh Food Group, Inc. generated $-2M FCF in 2024 (-13% vs 2021). The Vita Coco Company, Inc. generated $47M FCF in 2025 (+382% vs 2021).
BRFH vs COCO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRFH or COCO a better buy right now?
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) offers the better valuation at 48.8x trailing P/E (37.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BRFH or COCO?
Over the past 5 years, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) delivered a total return of +329.4%, compared to -50.7% for Barfresh Food Group, Inc. (BRFH). A $10,000 investment in COCO five years ago would be worth approximately $43K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COCO returned +329.4% versus BRFH's -75.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BRFH or COCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Barfresh Food Group, Inc. (BRFH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.46β versus The Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s 0.71β — meaning COCO is approximately 55% more volatile than BRFH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 144% for Barfresh Food Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — BRFH or COCO?
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.7% net margin versus -26.4% for Barfresh Food Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COCO leads at 13.5% versus -25.9% for BRFH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COCO leads at 36.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BRFH or COCO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is BRFH or COCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.71), +329.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COCO: +329.4%, BRFH: -75.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BRFH and COCO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.