Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $178M | $356M | $72M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $156M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $44M | $-97K |
| Gross Margin | 76.6% | 65.9% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 39.8% | -0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 8.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $36M | $75M | $28M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $81M | $35M |
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 227.8 | +127.8% |
| NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) | 100 | 112.3 | +12.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVFL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
- +42.2% vs NSTS's +10.8%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- 485.8% 10Y total return vs BVFL's 214.4%
- PEG 0.24 vs BVFL's 2.38
NSTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 50.6%
- Beta 0.30, current ratio 0.24x
- 10.2% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NSTS's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs NECB's 0.65 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs NSTS's +10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NSTS's 0.8% |
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 4 of 6 categories
NSTS leads 1 • BVFL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BVFL and NECB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB is the larger business by revenue, generating $156M annually — 11.8x NSTS's $13M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSTS's -0.7%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $156M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $63M | $206,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $44M | -$97,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $51M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +65.9% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +39.8% | -0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +28.4% | -0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +32.5% | +91.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +6.8% | +88.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 44% valuation discount to BVFL's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.23x vs BVFL's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $356M | $72M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $350M | $65M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.22x | 7.92x | -173.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.38x | 0.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.85x | 5.52x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 2.26x | 5.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.00x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.47x | 7.00x | 18.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-0 for NSTS. BVFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSTS's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BVFL scores 8/9 vs NECB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +13.1% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +2.2% | -0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +12.5% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +16.2% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.21x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | -$6M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $81M | $35M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $75M | $28M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | 1.17x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NECB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $23,831 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,913 for NSTS. Over the past 12 months, BVFL leads with a +42.2% total return vs NSTS's +10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NECB at 24.5% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +14.8% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +19.0% | +10.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | +93.0% | +51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +138.3% | +9.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +485.8% | +9.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +24.5% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
NSTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NECB's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.65x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.75 | $26.14 | $13.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.05 | $19.27 | $10.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +98.5% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 58.5 | 65.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 33K | 17K |
Analyst Outlook
NECB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
NECB is the only dividend payer here at 3.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.9% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
NECB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NSTS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BVFL vs NECB vs NSTS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVFL or NECB or NSTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus BV Financial, Inc. at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +138. 3%, compared to +9. 1% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +485. 8% versus NSTS's +9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 65β — meaning NECB is approximately 119% more volatile than NSTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 35% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NSTS Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 50. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -2. 9% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -2. 9% for NSTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NECB or NSTS?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BVFL, NSTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BVFL or NECB or NSTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 8% yield, +485. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NECB: +485. 8%, NSTS: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BVFL and NECB and NSTS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NSTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NECB pays a dividend while BVFL, NSTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.