Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $178M | $72M | $908.57B | $341.71B | $356M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $13M | $280.33B | $49.28B | $156M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-97K | $57.05B | $13.70B | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 76.6% | 76.2% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 65.9% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | -0.7% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 39.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | — | 14.6x | 24.3x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $28M | $942.38B | $45.49B | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $35M | $343.34B | $10.27B | $81M |
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS) | 100 | 112.3 | +12.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 218.9 | +118.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 130.1 | +30.1% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 227.8 | +127.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BVFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 19.5%, current ratio 4.18x
- Beta 0.44, current ratio 4.18x
- +42.2% vs NSTS's +10.8%
NSTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.2%, EPS growth 50.6%
- 10.2% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6%
- Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, JPM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs NSTS's -0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs -0.3%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- 485.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 481.2%
- PEG 0.24 vs BVFL's 2.38
- NIM 4.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% NII/revenue growth vs NECB's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.24 vs 2.17 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.4% margin vs NSTS's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.2% vs NSTS's +10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs NSTS's -0.0%, ROIC 15.8% vs -0.3% |
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • BVFL leads 0 • NSTS leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BVFL and NECB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 21119.0x NSTS's $13M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSTS's -0.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $13M | $280.3B | $49.3B | $156M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $206,000 | $81.4B | $15.5B | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$97,000 | $57.0B | $13.7B | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | $12M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.6% | +76.2% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +65.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | -0.7% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +39.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | -0.7% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +28.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +91.7% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +32.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +88.2% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 70% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.23x vs BVFL's 2.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $72M | $908.6B | $341.7B | $356M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $65M | $1.51T | $376.9B | $350M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.22x | -173.92x | 16.22x | 26.12x | 7.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.60x | 24.27x | 8.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.38x | — | 0.92x | 2.34x | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.85x | — | 18.52x | 25.45x | 5.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.39x | 5.45x | 3.25x | 7.13x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.84x | 2.51x | 9.99x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.47x | 18.31x | 9.01x | 64.52x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-0 for NSTS. BVFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BVFL scores 8/9 vs NECB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | -0.1% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -0.0% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | -0.3% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | -0.3% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.35x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $30M | -$8M | $599.0B | $35.2B | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $35M | $343.3B | $10.3B | $81M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $28M | $942.4B | $45.5B | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.33x | -0.03x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 1.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — JPM and NECB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $23,831 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,913 for NSTS. Over the past 12 months, BVFL leads with a +42.2% total return vs NSTS's +10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs BVFL's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +8.0% | +0.8% | +16.4% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.2% | +10.8% | +20.9% | +17.7% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.3% | +51.7% | +138.8% | +39.3% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.1% | +9.1% | +135.5% | +65.3% | +138.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.4% | +9.1% | +481.2% | +115.0% | +485.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +14.9% | +33.7% | +11.7% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSTS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSTS currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs KO's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.30x | 0.87x | -0.24x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.75 | $13.84 | $338.09 | $84.04 | $26.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.05 | $10.72 | $269.72 | $65.35 | $19.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +99.3% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 65.4 | 72.1 | 49.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 17K | 7.4M | 13.6M | 33K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and NECB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", NECB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $339.75 | $86.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 61 | 48 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.8% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 15 | 56 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.9% | +0.2% | +3.8% | +0.2% | +0.4% |
NECB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
BVFL vs NSTS vs JPM vs KO vs NECB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +138. 3%, compared to +9. 1% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. (NSTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +485. 8% versus NSTS's +9. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately -468% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NSTS Bancorp, Inc.
(NSTS) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -1. 6% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NSTS Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 50. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -2. 9% for NSTS Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -2. 9% for NSTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BVFL leads at 76. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 8. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), KO (2. 6% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BVFL, NSTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BVFL or NSTS or JPM or KO or NECB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, NSTS: +9. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BVFL and NSTS and JPM and KO and NECB?
These companies operate in different sectors (BVFL (Financial Services) and NSTS (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NECB (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BVFL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NSTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock. JPM, KO, NECB pay a dividend while BVFL, NSTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.