BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
Engineering & Construction
Market Cap$532M
5Y Perf.+124.5%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisBWMN
HURN
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BWMN vs HURN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
Consulting Services
Market Cap$1.77B
5Y Perf.+100.0%
BWMN vs HURN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  BWMN |  HURN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $532M | $1.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $377M | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 46.6% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $548M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $25M |
BWMN vs HURN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BWMN
HURN
| Stock | May 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowman Consulting G… (BWMN) | 100 | 224.5 | +124.5% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWMN vs HURN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HURN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇HURN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BWMN
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
The Growth Play
BWMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 329.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.3%
- 121.9% 10Y total return vs HURN's 86.9%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs HURN's 14.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
The Income Pick
HURN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.43
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  BWMN | 14.9% revenue growth vs HURN's 14.3% |
| Value |  HURN | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 17.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | HURN | 6.0% margin vs BWMN's 2.8% |
| Stability / Safety | HURN | Beta 0.43 vs BWMN's 1.81 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BWMN | +12.4% vs HURN's -19.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HURN | 6.8% ROA vs BWMN's 1.9%, ROIC 15.0% vs 3.6% |
BWMN vs HURN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BWMN vs HURN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLHURNLAGGINGBWMN
BWMNBowman Consulting Gro…
1leads
HURNHuron Consulting Grou…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BWMNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HURN4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HURN5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HURN5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BWMN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 4.6x BWMN's $377M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.0% (HURN) to 2.8% (BWMN). On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $377M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +0.8% |
HURN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, HURN trades at a 56% valuation discount to BWMN's 42.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HURN's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BWMN's 14.4x.
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $532M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $668M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.56x | 18.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.88x | 12.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.37x | 9.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.99x | 3.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.91x | 9.70x |
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HURN delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $4 for BWMN. BWMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWMN scores 6/9 vs HURN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.1% | +21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $136M | $524M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $548M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.38x | 7.70x |
HURN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWMN five years ago would be worth $22,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,285 for HURN. Over the past 12 months, BWMN leads with a +12.4% total return vs HURN's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HURN at 9.3% vs BWMN's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | -36.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.4% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.2% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.5% | +112.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +121.9% | +86.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +9.3% |
BWMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWMN and HURN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HURN is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWMN's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWMN currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs HURN's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.83 | $186.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.00 | $100.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.8% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 227K |
Evenly matched — BWMN and HURN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BWMN as "Buy" and HURN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.7% upside for BWMN (target: $58) vs 43.9% for HURN (target: $158).
| Metric | BWMNBowman Consulting… | HURNHuron Consulting … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $58.00 | $157.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +9.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
HURN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWMN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallHuron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BWMN vs HURN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWMN or HURN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
(BWMN) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 3% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWMN or HURN?
On trailing P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. at 42. 6x. On forward P/E, Huron Consulting Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWMN or HURN?
Over the past 5 years, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
(BWMN) delivered a total return of +128. 5%, compared to +112. 8% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWMN returned +121. 9% versus HURN's +86. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWMN or HURN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. 's 1. 81β — meaning BWMN is approximately 322% more volatile than HURN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWMN or HURN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
(BWMN) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus 14. 3% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. grew EPS 329. 4% year-over-year, compared to -6. 9% for Huron Consulting Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BWMN leads at 23. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWMN or HURN?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus 2. 5% for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 3. 9% for BWMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BWMN leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWMN or HURN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 9x for Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWMN: 86. 7% to $58. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWMN or HURN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BWMN or HURN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43)). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HURN: +86. 9%, BWMN: +121. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWMN and HURN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.