Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Application | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $43M | $16K | $4M | $567M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $12M | $83M | $116M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-740K | $-156M | $-116M | $-169M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 15.2% | 64.8% | 46.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | -7.2% | -132.8% | 101.8% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 79.1x | 0.0x | — | — | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2M | $47M | $134M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $273K | $6M | $2M | $122M | $10.27B |
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| byNordic Acquisitio… (BYNO) | 100 | 122.1 | +22.1% |
| Next Technology Hol… (NXTT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 131.2 | +31.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYNO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.11 vs BTBT's 3.70
NXTT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 133.17x
- Beta 1.74, current ratio 133.17x
- 5.5% revenue growth vs AIXI's -82.5%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 25.3x)
AIXI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BTBT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 121.1% 10Y total return vs BYNO's 27.8%
- 27.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs AIXI's -82.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs NXTT's -12.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs BTBT's 3.70 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.2% vs NXTT's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AIXI's -171.0% |
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
NXTT leads 1 • BYNO leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • BTBT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 36416.8x BYNO's $1M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXTT's -12.9%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $12M | $83M | $116M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$86M | -$109M | $162M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$739,762 | -$156M | -$116M | -$169M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $145M | -$4M | -$170.8B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +15.2% | +64.8% | +46.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | -7.2% | -132.8% | +101.8% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | -12.9% | -140.4% | -146.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | +12.0% | -4.3% | -1473.2% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -97.8% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.2% | -3.1% | -46.7% | -40.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NXTT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, NXTT trades at a 100% valuation discount to BYNO's 79.1x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $16,069 | $4M | $567M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49M | -$4M | $48M | $579M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 79.06x | 0.00x | -0.05x | -5.61x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.00x | — | — | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.00x | 0.34x | 4.99x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.00x | — | 5.19x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NXTT. NXTT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs BTBT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.0% | -30.0% | — | -0.1% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -26.2% | -171.0% | -0.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -22.5% | — | -5.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -26.3% | — | -7.2% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | — | 0.16x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | -$4M | $44M | $12M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $272,588 | $6M | $2M | $122M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2M | $47M | $134M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -20.26x | 0.01x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NXTT. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs NXTT's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 13.7% vs NXTT's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -73.5% | -8.6% | -14.7% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.0% | -99.3% | -84.3% | -33.1% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -99.9% | -99.2% | -41.0% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | -99.2% | -80.4% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -100.0% | -99.2% | -62.3% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -89.5% | -80.1% | -16.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BYNO and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYNO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs NXTT's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 1.74x | 1.21x | 3.70x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.75 | $738.00 | $62.00 | $4.55 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $0.45 | $0.27 | $1.25 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +0.2% | +12.7% | +38.2% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 51.3 | 39.1 | 45.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 414 | 145K | 12.9M | 23.1M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 244.8% upside for BTBT (target: $6) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $6.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 2 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.0% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.00 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +69.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NXTT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BYNO vs NXTT vs AIXI vs BTBT vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the stronger pick with 545. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -82. 5% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
On trailing P/E, Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus byNordic Acquisition Corporation at 79. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -100. 0% for Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +121. 1% versus NXTT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 70β — meaning BTBT is approximately -1948% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Next Technology Holding Inc. (NXTT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is pulling ahead at 545. 3% versus -82. 5% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Next Technology Holding Inc. grew EPS 728. 0% year-over-year, compared to -361. 3% for Xiao-I Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
Next Technology Holding Inc.
(NXTT) is the more profitable company, earning 1233% net margin versus -821. 1% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 1233% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -783. 6% for AIXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 244.
8% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BYNO, NXTT, AIXI, BTBT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYNO or NXTT or AIXI or BTBT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BTBT: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYNO and NXTT and AIXI and BTBT and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BYNO (Financial Services) and NXTT (Technology) and AIXI (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BYNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NXTT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while BYNO, NXTT, AIXI, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.