Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $586M | $4.55B | $442M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $525M | $4.05B | $541M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $150M | $62M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 10.7% | 8.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 1.5% | -2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 105.2x | 2.0x |
| Total Debt | $206M | $873M | $383M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $28M | $20M |
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Laboratories N… (CLB) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 512.2 | +412.2% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 523.1 | +423.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLB vs LBRT vs NINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.5%, EPS growth 3.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 73.8%, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 0.96, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.07x
LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 1.2%
- 73.5% 10Y total return vs NINE's -60.9%
- 1.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CLB's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NINE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 1.4% revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2%
- Lower P/E (2.0x vs 105.2x)
- 11.5% margin vs LBRT's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.4% revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.0x vs 105.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs LBRT's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs NINE's 2.94 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CLB's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.2% vs CLB's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.1% ROA vs LBRT's 4.0%, ROIC 0.1% vs 2.3% |
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 7.7x CLB's $525M. NINE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBRT's 3.7%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $525M | $4.0B | $541M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71M | $549M | $38M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $150M | $62M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $24M | -$193M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +10.7% | +8.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +1.5% | -2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +3.7% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -4.8% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.4% | +4.5% | -13.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.7% | +14.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NINE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, CLB trades at a 41% valuation discount to LBRT's 31.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LBRT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 16.1x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $586M | $4.5B | $442M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $769M | $5.4B | $805M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.71x | 31.54x | -8.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.24x | 105.21x | 2.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.11x | 9.28x | 16.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 1.14x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 2.24x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.93x | 322.49x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLB delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for LBRT. LBRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLB's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLB scores 6/9 vs NINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +7.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +4.0% | +18.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.3% | +2.3% | +0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +3.0% | +0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.42x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $183M | $846M | $363M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $28M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $873M | $383M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.18x | 5.24x | -0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $35,916 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,851 for CLB. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1518.8% total return vs CLB's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 43.0% vs CLB's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.8% | +49.6% | +2781.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.3% | +112.2% | +1518.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.8% | +105.9% | +192.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.5% | +93.0% | +259.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.0% | +73.5% | -60.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.0% | +27.2% | +43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLB and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLB is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 2.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs CLB's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.21x | 2.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.36 | $34.48 | $11.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.72 | $9.90 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.5% | +81.4% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 42.1 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 445K | 3.2M | 38K |
Analyst Outlook
LBRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLB as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 96.5% upside for CLB (target: $25) vs 23.7% for LBRT (target: $35). For income investors, LBRT offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs CLB's 0.32%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | $34.71 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
CLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NINE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
CLB vs LBRT vs NINE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLB or LBRT or NINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) is the stronger pick with 1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). Core Laboratories N. V. (CLB) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
On trailing P/E, Core Laboratories N.
V. (CLB) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus Liberty Energy Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, Nine Energy Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +259. 2%, compared to -71. 5% for Core Laboratories N. V. (CLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +73. 5% versus CLB's -83. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Core Laboratories N.
V. (CLB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 2. 94β — meaning NINE is approximately 206% more volatile than CLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 74% for Core Laboratories N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) is pulling ahead at 1. 4% versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Core Laboratories N. V. grew EPS 3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLB leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
Core Laboratories N.
V. (CLB) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 0% net margin versus -9. 1% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLB leads at 9. 3% versus 0. 1% for NINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLB leads at 17. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLB or LBRT or NINE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) trades at 2. 0x forward P/E versus 105. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 103. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLB: 96. 5% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLB or LBRT or NINE?
In this comparison, LBRT (1.
2% yield), CLB (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NINE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CLB or LBRT or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 1. 2% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 2. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +73. 5%, NINE: -60. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLB and LBRT and NINE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LBRT pays a dividend while CLB, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.