CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisCMBT
TEN
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
CMBT vs TEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.+285.8%
CMBT vs TEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  CMBT |  TEN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $3.56B | $1.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.67B | $801M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.7x | 5.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $303M |
CMBT vs TEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
CMBT
TEN
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT) | 100 | 190.2 | +90.2% |
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 385.8 | +285.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMBT vs TEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEN leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Cmb.Tech N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇TEN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play
CMBT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
- 191.6% 10Y total return vs TEN's 62.7%
- 77.2% revenue growth vs TEN's -0.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick
TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.26, current ratio 0.95x
- Beta 0.26, yield 5.2%, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  CMBT | 77.2% revenue growth vs TEN's -0.7% |
| Value |  TEN | Lower P/E (5.2x vs 7.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | TEN | 17.7% margin vs CMBT's 9.6% |
| Stability / Safety | TEN | Beta 0.26 vs CMBT's 0.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TEN | 5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs CMBT's 0.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEN | +117.6% vs CMBT's +73.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TEN | 3.7% ROA vs CMBT's 1.9%, ROIC 5.4% vs 4.7% |
CMBT vs TEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2021
CMBT vs TEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGCMBT
CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
0leads
TENTsakos Energy Navigat…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CMBTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TEN5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
TEN8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TEN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMBT and TEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 2.1x TEN's $801M. TEN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $801M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $856M | $365M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$612M | -$562M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | -70.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.6% | +18.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.4% | +3.1% |
Evenly matched — CMBT and TEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 59% valuation discount to CMBT's 21.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CMBT's 11.8x.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.23x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.67x | 5.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.84x | 6.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEN leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEN delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. TEN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMBT's 2.12x.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.12x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $303M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 2.45x |
TEN leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $48,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,907 for CMBT. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +117.6% total return vs CMBT's +73.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 36.6% vs CMBT's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.4% | +79.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.1% | +117.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.2% | +154.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.1% | +385.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.6% | +62.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +36.6% |
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMBT and TEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMBT's 0.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.72 | $45.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.78 | $18.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 35.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 304K |
Evenly matched — CMBT and TEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMBT as "Hold" and TEN as "Buy". For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.22% vs CMBT's 0.59%.
| Metric | CMBTCmb.Tech N.V. | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $2.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
TEN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
CMBT vs TEN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMBT or TEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMBT or TEN?
On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus Cmb. Tech N. V. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 5. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or TEN?
Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +385.
6%, compared to +169. 1% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMBT returned +191. 6% versus TEN's +62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMBT or TEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
26β versus Cmb. Tech N. V. 's 0. 42β — meaning CMBT is approximately 64% more volatile than TEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 2% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMBT or TEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.
Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -0. 7% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMBT or TEN?
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
1% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 30. 0% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEN leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMBT or TEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 5.
2x forward P/E versus 7. 7x for Cmb. Tech N. V. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or TEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).
09Is CMBT or TEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
26), 5. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEN: +62. 7%, CMBT: +191. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMBT and TEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and TEN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.