Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CMBT logo
CMBT
TEN logo
TEN
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
STNG logo
STNG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BE
Market Cap$3.56B
5Y Perf.+90.2%
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • GR
Market Cap$1.17B
5Y Perf.+285.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • MC
Market Cap$4.09B
5Y Perf.+517.1%

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CMBT logoCMBT
TEN logoTEN
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
STNG logoSTNG
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$3.56B$1.17B$355.61B$896.00B$4.09B
Revenue (TTM)$1.67B$801M$49.28B$280.33B$1.04B
Net Income (TTM)$161M$142M$13.70B$57.05B$502M
Gross Margin35.5%35.0%61.7%60.0%51.8%
Operating Margin27.4%29.3%29.3%25.9%38.8%
Forward P/E7.7x5.2x25.3x14.4x6.2x
Total Debt$5.57B$1.93B$45.49B$942.38B$619M
Cash & Equiv.$147M$303M$10.27B$343.34B$752M

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CMBT
TEN
KO
JPM
STNG
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Cmb.Tech N.V. (CMBT)100190.2+90.2%
Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN)100385.8+285.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG)100617.1+517.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: STNG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. CMBT and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇STNG emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
CMBT
Cmb.Tech N.V.
The Growth Play

CMBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 77.2%, EPS growth -83.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.2%
  • 77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
Best for: growth exposure
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick

TEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 5.2%
  • 5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
  • +117.6% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: income & stability
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Niche Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%
Best for: efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs CMBT's 191.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
The Defensive Pick

STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
  • PEG 0.19 vs KO's 2.26
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.1%, current ratio 9.33x
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.81
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMBT logoCMBT77.2% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
ValueSTNG logoSTNGLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsSTNG logoSTNG48.4% margin vs CMBT's 9.6%
Stability / SafetySTNG logoSTNGBeta 0.12 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsTEN logoTEN5.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)TEN logoTEN+117.6% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs 4.5%

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CMBTCmb.Tech N.V.
FY 2025
Spot Voyages
84.7%$822M
Pool Revenue
15.3%$148M
TENTsakos Energy Navigation Limited
FY 2021
Clean Air Division
67.7%$8.1B
Ride Performance Division
24.2%$2.9B
Powertrain
6.3%$755M
Motorparts
1.9%$223M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTENLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 350.1x TEN's $801M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBT's 9.6%. On growth, CMBT holds the edge at +160.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.7B$801M$49.3B$280.3B$1.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$856M$365M$15.5B$81.4B$580M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$142M$13.7B$57.0B$502M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$612M-$562M$12.6B$100.9B$389M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.5%+35.0%+61.7%+60.0%+51.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+29.3%+29.3%+25.9%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.6%+17.7%+27.8%+20.4%+48.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.7%-70.2%+25.5%+36.0%+37.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.6%+18.0%+12.1%+46.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.4%+3.1%+18.2%+16.0%+2.5%
STNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.7x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 68% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STNG offers better value at 0.34x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$1.2B$355.6B$896.0B$4.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.0B$2.8B$390.8B$1.50T$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.23x8.71x27.18x16.00x11.24x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.67x5.25x25.27x14.40x6.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x0.90x0.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.84x6.82x26.39x18.36x8.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.13x1.46x7.42x3.20x4.36x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.36x0.62x10.40x2.47x1.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x8.88x8.33x
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMBT. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs TEN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.2%+7.8%+41.1%+15.9%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.9%+3.7%+13.1%+1.3%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%+5.4%+15.8%+4.5%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.8%+7.1%+17.3%+8.9%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.12x1.04x1.33x2.60x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.4B$1.6B$35.2B$599.0B-$133M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$147M$303M$10.3B$343.3B$752M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.6B$1.9B$45.5B$942.4B$619M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.09x2.45x10.70x0.74x6.82x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $48,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +117.6% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 36.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+74.4%+79.4%+20.3%-0.5%+60.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+73.1%+117.6%+17.2%+21.8%+93.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.2%+154.9%+47.0%+138.2%+90.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.1%+385.6%+65.6%+118.2%+293.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.6%+62.7%+121.1%+465.8%+80.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.0%+36.6%+13.7%+33.6%+24.0%
TEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TEN's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.42x0.26x-0.20x0.94x0.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.72$45.85$84.04$337.25$87.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.78$18.10$65.35$262.71$38.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+84.6%+98.3%+95.1%+90.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.735.760.659.143.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M304K12.7M7.0M901K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CMBT as "Hold", TEN as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for TEN (target: $50) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.22% vs CMBT's 0.59%.

MetricCMBT logoCMBTCmb.Tech N.V.TEN logoTENTsakos Energy Nav…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STNG logoSTNGScorpio Tankers I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.00$86.13$339.75$87.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts326486131
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+5.2%+2.5%+1.9%+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0456153
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.09$2.02$2.04$5.95$1.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%+3.9%+0.0%
Evenly matched — TEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallTsakos Energy Navigation Li… (TEN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CMBT vs TEN vs KO vs JPM vs STNG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is the stronger pick with 77. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (5. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.

7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited is actually cheaper at 5. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Scorpio Tankers Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +385.

6%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus TEN's +62. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cmb.

Tech N. V. (CMBT) is pulling ahead at 77. 2% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMBT leads at 24. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

Scorpio Tankers Inc.

(STNG) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 9. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STNG leads at 33. 0% versus 22. 2% for CMBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) trades at 5. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEN: 29. 0% to $50. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 2%, versus 0. 6% for Cmb. Tech N. V. (CMBT).

09

Is CMBT or TEN or KO or JPM or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CMBT and TEN and KO and JPM and STNG?

These companies operate in different sectors (CMBT (Industrials) and TEN (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CMBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.