Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) vs Twilio Inc. (TWLO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CMCM | 20.5% revenue growth vs TWLO's 13.7% |
| Quality / Margins | TWLO | 0.7% net margin vs CMCM's -40.2% |
| Stability / Safety | CMCM | Beta 1.16 vs TWLO's 1.56, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CMCM | +16.3% vs TWLO's +0.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TWLO | 0.3% ROA vs CMCM's -8.7%, ROIC 1.5% vs -58.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cheetah Mobile is a Chinese internet company that develops mobile utility apps — primarily security and cleaning tools — and casual mobile games. It generates revenue mainly through mobile advertising (roughly 70-80% of total) and to a lesser extent from in-app purchases in its games and premium subscription services. Its competitive advantage stems from its large installed base of utility apps — particularly Clean Master and Security Master — which provide a captive audience for its advertising network.
Twilio is a cloud communications platform that enables developers to embed voice, messaging, video, and email capabilities into their applications through APIs. It generates revenue primarily from usage-based fees for its communication services — messaging (~60% of revenue), voice (~20%), and email/other services — with developers paying per message, minute, or email sent. Its key advantage is its developer-first platform with comprehensive APIs that create switching costs and network effects as more applications build on its infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CMCM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TWLO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TWLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 4.7x CMCM's $1.1B. TWLO is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMCM's -40.2%. On growth, CMCM holds the edge at +49.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$62M | $380M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$434M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.3% | +49.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.4% | +21.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.6% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.9% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $18.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $18.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 576.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 53.15x | 3.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TWLO delivers a 0.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-20 for CMCM. CMCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWLO's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 6/9 vs CMCM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.8% | +0.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.7% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -58.3% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.8B | $453M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $682M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CMCM five years ago would be worth $4,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,909 for TWLO. Over the past 12 months, CMCM leads with a +16.3% total return vs TWLO's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMCM at 34.1% vs TWLO's 21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.8% | -12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.3% | +0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.2% | +80.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.9% | -70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | +320.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | +21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CMCM is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs CMCM's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.44 | $145.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.28 | $77.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +82.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CMCM as "Buy" and TWLO as "Buy".
| Metric | CMCMCheetah Mobile In… | TWLOTwilio Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $141.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | 100 | 42.38 | -57.6% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 107.64 | +7.6% |
Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) returned -58% over 5 years vs Twilio Inc. (TWLO)'s -71%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | $657M | $807M | +22.7% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | $277M | $5.1B | +1727.1% |
Twilio Inc.'s revenue grew from $277M (2016) to $5.1B (2025) — a 38.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | -1.8% | -76.5% | -4238.6% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | -14.9% | 0.7% | +104.5% |
Twilio Inc.'s net margin went from -15% (2016) to 1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2020 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | 0.2 | 0 | -100.0% |
Cheetah Mobile Inc. has traded in a 0x–0x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-0x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) | -21 | -1,027 | -4790.5% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | -0.47 | 0.21 | +144.7% |
Twilio Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.47 (2016) to $0.21 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cheetah Mobile Inc. generated $-261M FCF in 2024 (-566% vs 2021). Twilio Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+797% vs 2021).
CMCM vs TWLO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCM or TWLO a better buy right now?
Twilio Inc. (TWLO) offers the better valuation at 576.0x trailing P/E (22.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CMCM or TWLO?
Over the past 5 years, Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) delivered a total return of -57.9%, compared to -70.9% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). A $10,000 investment in CMCM five years ago would be worth approximately $4K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +320.1% versus CMCM's -78.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CMCM or TWLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.16β versus Twilio Inc.'s 1.56β — meaning TWLO is approximately 34% more volatile than CMCM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 15% for Twilio Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — CMCM or TWLO?
Twilio Inc. (TWLO) is the more profitable company, earning 0.7% net margin versus -76.5% for Cheetah Mobile Inc. — meaning it keeps 0.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWLO leads at 3.4% versus -54.2% for CMCM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCM leads at 67.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CMCM or TWLO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CMCM or TWLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheetah Mobile Inc. (CMCM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.16)). Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a higher beta of 1.56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCM: -78.6%, TWLO: +320.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CMCM and TWLO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 24%
- Gross Margin > 44%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 7%
- Gross Margin > 29%