Chemicals - Specialty
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Luxury Goods
Medical - Devices
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction | Luxury Goods | Medical - Devices | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products |
| Market Cap | $227M | $4.74B | $2.46B | $1.81B | $4.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $271M | $1.18B | $3.47B | $603M | $6.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $191M | $137M | $68M | $264M |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 39.2% | 59.7% | 28.3% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 22.1% | 1.8% | 15.3% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.0x | 27.2x | 15.2x | 24.7x | 18.2x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $229M | $1.42B | $154M | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $4M | $135M | $20M | $925M |
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Molding Techno… (CMT) | 100 | 598.1 | +498.1% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 136.5 | +36.5% |
| UFP Technologies, I… (UFPT) | 100 | 533.2 | +433.2% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 170.8 | +70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49 vs CPRI's 1.93, lower leverage
- +47.7% vs TREX's -20.1%
TREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 16.3% margin vs CMT's 3.5%
- 12.3% ROA vs CPRI's 3.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs 2.6%
CPRI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 27.2x)
UFPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 15.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.4%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs TREX's 340.6%
- PEG 0.66 vs TREX's 8.14
- 19.5% revenue growth vs CPRI's -21.8%
UFPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.7%
- 1.7% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs CPRI's -21.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 27.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs CMT's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs CPRI's 1.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.7% vs TREX's -20.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs CPRI's 3.2%, ROIC 16.4% vs 2.6% |
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories
UFPI leads 2 • UFPT leads 1 • CMT leads 1 • CPRI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UFPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 22.8x CMT's $271M. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMT's 3.5%. On growth, UFPT holds the edge at +3.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $271M | $1.2B | $3.5B | $603M | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $327M | $185M | $116M | $498M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $191M | $137M | $68M | $264M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $239M | -$109M | $79M | $298M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +39.2% | +59.7% | +28.3% | +16.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +22.1% | +1.8% | +15.3% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +16.3% | +3.9% | +11.3% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +20.3% | -3.1% | +13.1% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +1.0% | -23.1% | +3.4% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.2% | +3.6% | +99.4% | +6.7% | -31.5% |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 39% valuation discount to CPRI's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UFPT offers better value at 0.71x vs TREX's 7.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227M | $4.7B | $2.5B | $1.8B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $222M | $5.0B | $3.7B | $1.9B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.10x | 25.63x | 27.70x | 26.79x | 16.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.03x | 27.22x | 15.18x | 24.72x | 18.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.38x | 7.66x | — | 0.71x | 3.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 15.47x | 18.43x | 16.81x | 7.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 4.04x | 0.71x | 3.01x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 4.72x | 30.43x | 4.33x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 118.29x | 35.24x | 175.49x | 22.94x | 17.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRI delivers a 99.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $99 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMT. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 16.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TREX scores 6/9 vs UFPI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +18.8% | +99.5% | +17.4% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +12.3% | +3.2% | +10.5% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +16.4% | +2.6% | +12.7% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +23.2% | +2.7% | +16.1% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.22x | 16.90x | 0.36x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $225M | $1.3B | $134M | -$695M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $4M | $135M | $20M | $925M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $229M | $1.4B | $154M | $230M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 144.87x | — | — | 9.42x | 43.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UFPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UFPT five years ago would be worth $40,725 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,918 for CPRI. Over the past 12 months, CMT leads with a +47.7% total return vs TREX's -20.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UFPT at 10.8% vs CPRI's -16.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.6% | +27.4% | -12.5% | +5.2% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.7% | -20.1% | +19.6% | -1.0% | -11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | -21.9% | -41.6% | +36.0% | -0.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.5% | -54.4% | -60.8% | +307.2% | +23.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.8% | +340.6% | -57.1% | +1018.2% | +224.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | -7.9% | -16.4% | +10.8% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMT currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.51x | 1.93x | 1.11x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.69 | $68.78 | $28.27 | $274.93 | $118.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.12 | $29.77 | $16.22 | $173.88 | $77.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +66.3% | +75.5% | +85.5% | +71.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 66.5 | 65.3 | 68.3 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.7M | 2.7M | 203K | 425K |
Analyst Outlook
UFPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMT as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold", UFPT as "Buy", UFPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.8% upside for UFPT (target: $298) vs -2.6% for CMT (target: $24). UFPI is the only dividend payer here at 1.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $48.33 | $23.63 | $298.00 | $97.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 31 | 54 | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.1% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +9.0% |
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UFPI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CMT vs TREX vs CPRI vs UFPT vs UFPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) is the stronger pick with 19. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 9x versus Capri Holdings Limited at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Capri Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UFP Technologies, Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
Over the past 5 years, UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) delivered a total return of +307. 2%, compared to -60. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UFPT returned +1018% versus CPRI's -57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
(CMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 1. 93β — meaning CPRI is approximately 296% more volatile than CMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 17% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UFP Technologies, Inc.
(UFPT) is pulling ahead at 19. 5% versus -21. 8% for Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capri Holdings Limited grew EPS 107. 7% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for UFP Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UFPT leads at 19. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 2. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus 2. 4% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 58. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 27. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UFPT: 26. 8% to $298. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI?
In this comparison, UFPI (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. CMT, TREX, CPRI, UFPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMT or TREX or CPRI or UFPT or UFPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 1. 7% yield, +224. 9% 10Y return). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UFPI: +224. 9%, CPRI: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMT and TREX and CPRI and UFPT and UFPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMT (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials) and CPRI (Consumer Cyclical) and UFPT (Healthcare) and UFPI (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UFPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock. UFPI pays a dividend while CMT, TREX, CPRI, UFPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.