Chemicals - Specialty
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CMT vs TREX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Banks - Diversified
CMT vs TREX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $227M | $4.74B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $271M | $1.18B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $191M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 39.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 22.1% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 23.0x | 27.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $33M | $229M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $4M | $343.34B |
CMT vs TREX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Molding Techno… (CMT) | 100 | 598.1 | +498.1% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 70.2 | -29.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMT vs TREX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.49 vs TREX's 1.51, lower leverage
TREX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 12.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 16.4% vs 4.5%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs TREX's 340.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs CMT's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 27.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 8.14 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs CMT's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs TREX's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.7% vs TREX's -20.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 16.4% vs 4.5% |
CMT vs TREX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CMT vs TREX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1034.7x CMT's $271M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMT's 3.5%. On growth, TREX holds the edge at +1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $271M | $1.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $327M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $191M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $239M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +39.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +22.1% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +16.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +20.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +1.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -72.2% | +3.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 38% valuation discount to TREX's 25.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs TREX's 7.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $227M | $4.7B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $222M | $5.0B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.10x | 25.63x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.03x | 27.22x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.38x | 7.66x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 15.47x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | 4.04x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 4.72x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 118.29x | 35.24x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $6 for CMT. CMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TREX scores 6/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +18.8% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +12.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +16.4% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +23.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.22x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $225M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $4M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33M | $229M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 144.87x | — | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,561 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, CMT leads with a +47.7% total return vs TREX's -20.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs TREX's -7.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.6% | +27.4% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.7% | -20.1% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.5% | -21.9% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.5% | -54.4% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.8% | +340.6% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.7% | -7.9% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 66.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.51x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.69 | $68.78 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.12 | $29.77 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.9% | +66.3% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 66.5 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.7M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMT as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -2.6% for CMT (target: $24). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $48.33 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 31 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.1% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CMT vs TREX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMT or TREX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMT or TREX or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMT or TREX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -54. 4% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus CMT's +88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMT or TREX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
(CMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning TREX is approximately 210% more volatile than CMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMT or TREX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -9. 5% for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -14. 8% for Trex Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TREX leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMT or TREX or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 4. 1% for Core Molding Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 5. 2% for CMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMT or TREX or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 8. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 2x for Trex Company, Inc. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMT or TREX or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CMT, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMT or TREX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, TREX: +340. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMT and TREX and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMT (Basic Materials) and TREX (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while CMT, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.