Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) vs BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | BMRN | Beta 0.74 vs COGT's 1.43, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | COGT | +415.9% vs BMRN's -13.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BMRN | 4.6% ROA vs COGT's -35.1%, ROIC 7.4% vs -66.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cogent Biosciences is a biotechnology company developing precision therapies for genetically defined diseases, particularly focusing on cancers driven by specific mutations. The company generates revenue primarily through research collaborations and licensing agreements — it currently has no commercial products and relies on funding from partnerships and equity offerings to advance its clinical pipeline. Its key competitive advantage lies in its targeted approach to inhibiting specific oncogenic mutations like KIT D816V, which could offer differentiated efficacy and safety profiles compared to broader kinase inhibitors.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical is a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing therapies for rare genetic diseases. It generates revenue primarily from sales of its orphan drug portfolio — including Voxzogo, Vimizim, and Palynziq — with additional income from licensing and royalties. The company's moat lies in its deep expertise in rare disease biology and its established commercial infrastructure for ultra-orphan drugs, which creates high barriers to entry.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
COGT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). BMRN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BMRN and COGT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$333M | $613M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$329M | $349M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$266M | $725M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +77.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.1% | -134.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $11.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $11.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.24x | 34.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.13x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMRN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-52 for COGT. BMRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COGT's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMRN scores 5/9 vs COGT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.7% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.1% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -66.4% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.2% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$59M | -$715M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $312M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $253M | $597M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -108.87x | 48.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in COGT five years ago would be worth $47,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,797 for BMRN. Over the past 12 months, COGT leads with a +415.9% total return vs BMRN's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COGT at 43.2% vs BMRN's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +415.9% | -13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.7% | -38.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +372.1% | -22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.6% | -24.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.2% | -14.7% |
Risk & Volatility
BMRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COGT's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COGT currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs BMRN's 84.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.73 | $73.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.72 | $50.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 56.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates COGT as "Buy" and BMRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.8% upside for BMRN (target: $82) vs 23.9% for COGT (target: $48).
| Metric | COGTCogent Bioscience… | BMRNBioMarin Pharmace… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.13 | $82.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | 100 | 1,725.45 | +1625.5% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 100 | 61.39 | -38.6% |
Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) returned +372% over 5 years vs BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN)'s -22%. A $10,000 investment in COGT 5 years ago would be worth $47,205 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | $6M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | $1.1B | $0.00 | -100.0% |
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue grew from $6M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR. BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s revenue grew from $1.1B (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | -2.2% | -9.5% | -330.5% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | -19.3% | 15.0% | +177.5% |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s net margin went from -19% (2015) to 15% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | 19.4 | 424.5 | +2088.1% |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. has traded in a 19x–425x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cogent Biosciences,… (COGT) | -2.45 | -2.55 | -4.1% |
| BioMarin Pharmaceut… (BMRN) | -3.79 | 0.14 | +103.7% |
Cogent Biosciences, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-2.45 (2016) to $-2.55 (2025). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s EPS grew from $-3.79 (2016) to $0.14 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cogent Biosciences, Inc. generated $-266M FCF in 2025 (-340% vs 2021). BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. generated $725M FCF in 2025 (+291% vs 2021).
COGT vs BMRN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COGT or BMRN a better buy right now?
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) offers the better valuation at 34.3x trailing P/E (15.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — COGT or BMRN?
Over the past 5 years, Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) delivered a total return of +372.1%, compared to -22.0% for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN). A $10,000 investment in COGT five years ago would be worth approximately $47K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COGT returned -12.6% versus BMRN's -24.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — COGT or BMRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.74β versus Cogent Biosciences, Inc.'s 1.43β — meaning COGT is approximately 92% more volatile than BMRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 40% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — COGT or BMRN?
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) is the more profitable company, earning 10.8% net margin versus 0.0% for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMRN leads at 16.6% versus 0.0% for COGT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMRN leads at 77.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is COGT or BMRN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMRN: 32.8% to $82.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — COGT or BMRN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is COGT or BMRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (BMRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.74)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMRN: -24.6%, COGT: -12.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between COGT and BMRN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.