Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
COSO vs CZWI vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
COSO vs CZWI vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $323M | $207M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $90M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $14M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 57.9% | 54.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 7.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 11.8x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $52M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $119M | $10.27B |
COSO vs CZWI vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoastalSouth Bancsh… (COSO) | 100 | 280.4 | +180.4% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COSO vs CZWI vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COSO is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.53 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 4.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
- 149.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.53 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs COSO's 0.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0% |
COSO vs CZWI vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COSO vs CZWI vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 547.2x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $90M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $9M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $14M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $11M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.9% | +54.7% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +7.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +16.0% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +12.4% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.7% | +63.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
COSO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, COSO trades at a 54% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COSO offers better value at 0.57x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $207M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $311M | $140M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.48x | 14.70x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.62x | 11.79x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 2.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.31x | 15.69x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 2.29x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.11x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.27x | 19.90x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. COSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +7.8% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.8% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +2.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +0.6% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.28x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$67M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $119M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $52M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.58x | 0.16x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,809 for COSO. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | +24.3% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.3% | +52.1% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +153.7% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.1% | +69.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | +149.0% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.1% | +36.4% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COSO's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.50x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.42 | $22.62 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.24 | $12.83 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +94.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.7 | 51.2 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 41K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COSO as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.3% upside for COSO (target: $30) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.00 | — | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COSO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
COSO vs CZWI vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COSO or CZWI or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.
(COSO) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COSO or CZWI or KO?
On trailing P/E, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.
(COSO) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COSO or CZWI or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +58. 1% for CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +149. 0% versus COSO's +35. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COSO or CZWI or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning COSO is approximately -354% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COSO or CZWI or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.
(COSO) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 3% for CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COSO or CZWI or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COSO or CZWI or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COSO: 11. 3% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — COSO or CZWI or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. COSO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COSO or CZWI or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, COSO: +35. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COSO and CZWI and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (COSO (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: COSO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CZWI, KO pay a dividend while COSO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.