Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
CRNT logo
CRNT
SATS logo
SATS
KO logo
KO
GILT logo
GILT
QCOM logo
QCOM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CRNT
Ceragon Networks Ltd.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.+25.6%
SATS
EchoStar Corporation

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.46B
5Y Perf.+290.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$341.71B
5Y Perf.+77.7%
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$842M
5Y Perf.+107.1%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$238.32B
5Y Perf.+147.9%

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CRNT logoCRNT
SATS logoSATS
KO logoKO
GILT logoGILT
QCOM logoQCOM
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication EquipmentBeverages - Non-AlcoholicCommunication EquipmentSemiconductors
Market Cap$243M$31.46B$341.71B$842M$238.32B
Revenue (TTM)$335M$14.80B$49.28B$470M$44.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-23.27B$13.70B$32M$9.92B
Gross Margin34.4%39.1%61.7%30.3%54.8%
Operating Margin3.0%-116.5%29.3%5.2%25.5%
Forward P/E20.1x314.9x24.3x22.2x21.1x
Total Debt$50M$31.01B$45.49B$11M$16.37B
Cash & Equiv.$38M$1.88B$10.27B$169M$7.84B

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CRNT
SATS
KO
GILT
QCOM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Ceragon Networks Lt… (CRNT)100125.6+25.6%
EchoStar Corporation (SATS)100390.5+290.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100177.7+77.7%
Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT)100207.1+107.1%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100247.9+147.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SATS and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. CRNT, GILT, and QCOM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CRNT
Ceragon Networks Ltd.
The Value Play

CRNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (20.1x vs 21.1x)
Best for: value
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
The Defensive Choice

SATS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and momentum.

  • Beta 1.65 vs GILT's 2.25
  • +339.0% vs KO's +17.7%
Best for: stability and momentum
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.23, yield 2.6%
  • PEG 2.17 vs QCOM's 10.13
  • 27.8% margin vs SATS's -157.2%
  • 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
GILT
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
The Growth Play

GILT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
  • 47.9% revenue growth vs CRNT's -14.1%
Best for: growth exposure
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder

QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 372.1% 10Y total return vs SATS's 177.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.94, Low D/E 77.2%, current ratio 2.82x
  • Beta 1.94, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.82x
  • 18.4% ROA vs SATS's -49.1%, ROIC 29.1% vs -32.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGILT logoGILT47.9% revenue growth vs CRNT's -14.1%
ValueCRNT logoCRNTLower P/E (20.1x vs 21.1x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SATS's -157.2%
Stability / SafetySATS logoSATSBeta 1.65 vs GILT's 2.25
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SATS logoSATS+339.0% vs KO's +17.7%
Efficiency (ROA)QCOM logoQCOM18.4% ROA vs SATS's -49.1%, ROIC 29.1% vs -32.9%

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
CRNTCeragon Networks Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SATSEchoStar Corporation
FY 2024
Service revenue
94.5%$15.0B
Equipment sales and other revenue
5.5%$869M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
GILTGilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
FY 2025
Products
72.7%$328M
Services
27.3%$123M
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGGILT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 147.1x CRNT's $335M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SATS's -157.2%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$335M$14.8B$49.3B$470M$44.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$24M-$16.0B$15.5B$49M$12.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$23.3B$13.7B$32M$9.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M-$909M$12.6B$3M$12.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.4%+39.1%+61.7%+30.3%+54.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%-116.5%+29.3%+5.2%+25.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.7%-157.2%+27.8%+6.8%+22.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.8%-6.1%+25.5%+0.7%+28.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.1%-5.2%+12.1%+20.0%-3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-48.0%+28.2%+18.2%+161.6%+173.0%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CRNT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 26.1x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 42% valuation discount to QCOM's 45.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KO offers better value at 2.34x vs QCOM's 21.70x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Market CapShares × price$243M$31.5B$341.7B$842M$238.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$254M$60.6B$376.9B$684M$246.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-115.88x-2.17x26.12x38.79x45.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.15x314.88x24.27x22.23x21.06x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x21.70x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.01x25.45x15.58x17.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.72x2.10x7.13x1.86x5.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x5.40x9.99x1.59x11.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.52x64.52x91.62x18.59x
CRNT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SATS. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SATS's 5.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs GILT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-1.4%-2.4%+41.1%+7.3%+40.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.8%-49.1%+13.1%+4.7%+18.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.7%-32.9%+15.8%+5.7%+29.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.7%-41.3%+17.3%+4.7%+28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933736
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x5.33x1.33x0.02x0.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$11M$29.1B$35.2B-$158M$8.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$38M$1.9B$10.3B$169M$7.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$50M$31.0B$45.5B$11M$16.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.65x-9.93x10.70x8.81x17.60x
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SATS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SATS five years ago would be worth $40,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,143 for CRNT. Over the past 12 months, SATS leads with a +339.0% total return vs KO's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SATS at 85.8% vs CRNT's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.3%-2.7%+16.4%-1.6%+31.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.9%+339.0%+17.7%+111.4%+49.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+31.1%+541.4%+39.3%+121.7%+97.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.6%+305.8%+65.3%+33.8%+82.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.7%+177.4%+115.0%+214.6%+372.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.4%+85.8%+11.7%+30.4%+25.4%
SATS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GILT's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs GILT's 63.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.04x1.65x-0.23x2.25x1.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.29$147.25$84.04$20.93$259.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.82$24.15$65.35$6.24$121.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.1%+74.1%+94.5%+63.0%+87.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.541.549.238.750.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded636K8.0M13.6M875K21.8M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CRNT as "Buy", SATS as "Buy", KO as "Buy", GILT as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.4% upside for CRNT (target: $4) vs -15.5% for QCOM (target: $191). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs QCOM's 1.52%.

MetricCRNT logoCRNTCeragon Networks …SATS logoSATSEchoStar Corporat…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…GILT logoGILTGilat Satellite N…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.25$144.00$86.13$20.00$191.05
# AnalystsCovering analysts61148269
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises056022
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04$3.44
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+0.2%0.0%+3.7%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). CRNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CRNT vs SATS vs KO vs GILT vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 1% for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 1x trailing P/E (24. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 26.

1x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 45. 1x. On forward P/E, Ceragon Networks Ltd. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Coca-Cola Company wins at 2. 17x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 10. 13x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

Over the past 5 years, EchoStar Corporation (SATS) delivered a total return of +305.

8%, compared to -28. 6% for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +372. 1% versus CRNT's +60. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

23β versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. 's 2. 25β — meaning GILT is approximately -1062% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for EchoStar Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.

(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -14. 1% for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -113. 6% for EchoStar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -155. 1% for EchoStar Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -118. 1% for SATS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 17x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 10. 13x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 314. 9x for EchoStar Corporation — 294. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRNT: 57. 4% to $4. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield), QCOM (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CRNT, SATS, GILT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CRNT or SATS or KO or GILT or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, CRNT: +60. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CRNT and SATS and KO and GILT and QCOM?

These companies operate in different sectors (CRNT (Technology) and SATS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and GILT (Technology) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SATS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO, QCOM pay a dividend while CRNT, SATS, GILT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.