Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $443M | $6.75B | $355.22B | $6.77B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $49.28B | $51M | $158M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-58M | $-506M | $13.70B | $-315M | $-107M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 61.7% | 33.2% | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | 29.3% | -7.0% | -80.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $8M | $72K | $45.49B | $82M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $902M | $10.27B | $357M | $197M |
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contineum Therapeut… (CTNM) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 122.5 | +22.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 133.8 | +33.8% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 256.4 | +156.4% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 125.4 | +25.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTNM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 27.50x
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 230.5% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 149.4%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
Among these 5 stocks, KYMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.16
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- 20.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
- Beta 0.16 vs IMVT's 1.67
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs IMVT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs KO's +17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
CTNM leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • DAWN leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KO and DAWN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $49.3B | $51M | $158M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | -$532M | $15.5B | -$352M | -$124M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$58M | -$506M | $13.7B | -$315M | -$107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$58M | -$407M | $12.6B | -$244M | -$108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +61.7% | +33.2% | +89.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | +29.3% | -7.0% | -80.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | +27.8% | -6.1% | -67.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | +25.5% | -4.7% | -68.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | +55.5% | +83.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.1% | -14.1% | +18.2% | +13.4% | +70.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CTNM and KO and KYMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $443M | $6.8B | $355.2B | $6.8B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $376M | $5.8B | $390.4B | $6.5B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.47x | -11.87x | 27.15x | -22.48x | -20.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.24x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.36x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 7.41x | 172.78x | 14.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 7.04x | 10.39x | 4.43x | 5.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 67.07x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.1% | -68.2% | +41.1% | -25.0% | -23.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.6% | -62.2% | +13.1% | -22.3% | -20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | — | +15.8% | -24.9% | -30.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.0% | -68.3% | +17.3% | -27.2% | -26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.00x | 1.33x | 0.05x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | -$902M | $35.2B | -$275M | -$194M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $902M | $10.3B | $357M | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $72,000 | $45.5B | $82M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 10.70x | -2119.53x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IMVT and KYMR and DAWN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,701 for CTNM. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +219.0% total return vs KO's +17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 48.9% vs CTNM's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +26.9% | +20.2% | +14.0% | +143.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +159.5% | +103.6% | +17.4% | +71.4% | +219.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +51.6% | +46.9% | +230.0% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +207.0% | +63.6% | +64.1% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +230.5% | +120.9% | +149.4% | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.3% | +14.9% | +13.7% | +48.9% | +19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and DAWN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CTNM's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.66x | -0.20x | 0.91x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.33 | $36.27 | $84.04 | $103.00 | $21.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.57 | $14.32 | $65.35 | $36.65 | $5.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.6% | +90.6% | +98.2% | +80.5% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.8 | 51.9 | 65.7 | 47.7 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 207K | 1.9M | 12.6M | 493K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTNM as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.7% upside for KYMR (target: $113) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $43.67 | $86.29 | $112.60 | $21.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 23 | 48 | 26 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
CTNM vs IMVT vs KO vs KYMR vs DAWN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Contineum Therapeutics, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CTNM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -23. 0% for Contineum Therapeutics, Inc. Class A Common Stock (CTNM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus CTNM's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning IMVT is approximately -928% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -33. 1% for Contineum Therapeutics, Inc. Class A Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KYMR: 35.
7% to $112. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. CTNM, IMVT, KYMR, DAWN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CTNM or IMVT or KO or KYMR or DAWN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, IMVT: +237. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CTNM and IMVT and KO and KYMR and DAWN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CTNM (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and KYMR (Healthcare) and DAWN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CTNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock. KO pays a dividend while CTNM, IMVT, KYMR, DAWN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.