Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DNTH vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
DNTH vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3.19B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | -143.2% | -168.6% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $222M |
DNTH vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dianthus Therapeuti… (DNTH) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 94.2 | -5.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DNTH vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.29
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 13.32x
- Beta 1.29, current ratio 13.32x
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.3%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.2%
- 37.1% 10Y total return vs DNTH's -67.1%
- -4.3% revenue growth vs DNTH's -67.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.3% revenue growth vs DNTH's -67.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -156.4% margin vs DNTH's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.29 vs RCUS's 1.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +321.9% vs RCUS's +156.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.7% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC -34.4% vs -64.1% |
DNTH vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DNTH vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $236M annually — 176.6x DNTH's $1M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -156.4% (RCUS) to -8.5% (DNTH). On growth, RCUS holds the edge at -39.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$191M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$130M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.2% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -97.7% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.2% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.20x | -7.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1567.68x | 9.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.86x | 3.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DNTH delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. DNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DNTH scores 2/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.4% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $9,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,126 for DNTH. Over the past 12 months, DNTH leads with a +321.9% total return vs RCUS's +156.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DNTH at 89.0% vs RCUS's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +92.7% | +0.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +321.9% | +156.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +574.8% | +15.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | -6.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.1% | +37.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.0% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DNTH and RCUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DNTH is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.50 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.64 | $7.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 674K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DNTH as "Buy" and RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.4% upside for DNTH (target: $112) vs 33.8% for RCUS (target: $31).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $111.91 | $31.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCUS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DNTH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
DNTH vs RCUS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DNTH or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the stronger pick with -4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 3% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH). Analysts rate Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DNTH or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -6. 4%, compared to -58. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +37. 1% versus DNTH's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DNTH or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
(DNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 29β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning RCUS is approximately 53% more volatile than DNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DNTH or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is pulling ahead at -4. 3% versus -67. 3% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. (DNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcus Biosciences, Inc. grew EPS -4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DNTH or RCUS?
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) is the more profitable company, earning -142. 9% net margin versus -79. 7% for Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -142. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCUS leads at -156. 3% versus -87. 4% for DNTH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DNTH leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — DNTH or RCUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is DNTH or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Dianthus Therapeutics, Inc.
(DNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DNTH: -67. 1%, RCUS: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between DNTH and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.