Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
DOCS logo
DOCS
LLY logo
LLY
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
HIMS logo
HIMS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.75B
5Y Perf.-65.6%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.07T
5Y Perf.+393.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+106.2%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+52.7%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.89B
5Y Perf.+146.3%

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DOCS logoDOCS
LLY logoLLY
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
HIMS logoHIMS
IndustryMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicMedical - Equipment & Services
Market Cap$3.75B$1.07T$896.00B$355.61B$5.89B
Revenue (TTM)$645M$72.25B$280.33B$49.28B$2.37B
Net Income (TTM)$196M$25.27B$57.05B$13.70B$-13M
Gross Margin89.1%83.5%60.0%61.7%67.6%
Operating Margin33.3%45.9%25.9%29.3%1.3%
Forward P/E14.0x30.9x14.4x25.3x52.6x
Total Debt$10M$42.50B$942.38B$45.49B$1.26B
Cash & Equiv.$219M$7.16B$343.34B$10.27B$229M

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DOCS
LLY
JPM
KO
HIMS
StockJun 21Jun 26Return
Doximity, Inc. (DOCS)10034.4-65.6%
Eli Lilly and Compa… (LLY)100493.6+393.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100206.2+106.2%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100152.7+52.7%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100246.3+146.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LLY leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Doximity, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. KO and HIMS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇LLY emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.09x
  • PEG 0.27 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (14.0x vs 52.6x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
The Growth Play

LLY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 44.7%, EPS growth 96.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.7%
  • 14.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • Beta 0.53, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.58x
  • 35.0% margin vs HIMS's -0.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, JPM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Leader

HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 59.0% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueDOCS logoDOCSLower P/E (14.0x vs 52.6x)
Quality / MarginsLLY logoLLY35.0% margin vs HIMS's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyLLY logoLLYBeta 0.53 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs LLY's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LLY logoLLY+40.3% vs DOCS's -64.8%
Efficiency (ROA)LLY logoLLY22.7% ROA vs HIMS's -0.6%, ROIC 41.8% vs 8.6%

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the GLP-1 Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the GLP-1 Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
DOCSDoximity, Inc.
FY 2026
Subscription
94.3%$608M
Service, Other
5.7%$36M
LLYEli Lilly and Company
FY 2025
Product
93.5%$61.0B
Collaboration and Other Revenue
6.5%$4.2B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLLYLAGGINGHIMS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 434.7x DOCS's $645M. LLY is the more profitable business, keeping 35.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIMS's -0.6%. On growth, LLY holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$645M$72.2B$280.3B$49.3B$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$227M$34.7B$81.4B$15.5B$99M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$196M$25.3B$57.0B$13.7B-$13M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$215M$13.6B$100.9B$12.6B$76M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.1%+83.5%+60.0%+61.7%+67.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.3%+45.9%+25.9%+29.3%+1.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.4%+35.0%+20.4%+27.8%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+33.3%+18.8%+36.0%+25.5%+3.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.1%+55.5%+12.1%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-67.7%+169.9%+16.0%+18.2%-3.0%
LLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — DOCS and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 70% valuation discount to HIMS's 52.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.39x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Market CapShares × price$3.7B$1.07T$896.0B$355.6B$5.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.5B$1.11T$1.50T$390.8B$6.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.45x49.37x16.00x27.18x52.59x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.99x30.95x14.40x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x1.71x0.90x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.47x35.38x18.36x26.39x43.24x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.81x16.42x3.20x7.42x2.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.20x38.34x2.47x10.40x12.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF119.31x8.88x67.15x79.62x
Evenly matched — DOCS and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LLY delivers a 101.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $101 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HIMS. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LLY scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.4%+101.2%+15.9%+41.1%-2.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.5%+22.7%+1.3%+13.1%-0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+19.8%+41.8%+4.5%+15.8%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+20.7%+46.6%+8.9%+17.3%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x1.60x2.60x1.33x2.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$209M$35.3B$599.0B$35.2B$1.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$219M$7.2B$343.3B$10.3B$229M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$42.5B$942.4B$45.5B$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense35.68x0.74x10.70x
LLY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LLY five years ago would be worth $51,207 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,781 for DOCS. Over the past 12 months, LLY leads with a +40.3% total return vs DOCS's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 44.0% vs DOCS's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-53.7%+5.2%-0.5%+20.3%-19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-64.8%+40.3%+21.8%+17.2%-53.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-38.7%+158.2%+138.2%+47.0%+198.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.2%+412.1%+118.2%+65.6%+107.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.2%+1484.6%+465.8%+121.1%+173.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.0%+37.2%+33.6%+13.7%+44.0%
LLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.75x0.53x0.94x-0.20x2.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$76.51$1182.73$337.25$84.04$70.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.16$623.78$262.71$65.35$13.74
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.2%+95.8%+95.1%+98.3%+38.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.770.059.160.659.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.9M2.6M7.0M12.7M24.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DOCS as "Hold", LLY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.1% upside for DOCS (target: $29) vs 0.7% for HIMS (target: $27). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs LLY's 0.53%.

MetricDOCS logoDOCSDoximity, Inc.LLY logoLLYEli Lilly and Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.47$1268.94$339.75$86.13$27.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2345614820
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.9%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111556
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.00$5.95$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+11.5%+0.4%+3.9%+0.2%+1.5%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LLY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallEli Lilly and Company (LLY)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DOCS vs LLY vs JPM vs KO vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 52. 6x. On forward P/E, Doximity, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

Over the past 5 years, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) delivered a total return of +412.

1%, compared to -62. 2% for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LLY returned +1485% versus DOCS's -62. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately -1340% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Eli Lilly and Company grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 7% for Doximity, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

7% net margin versus 5. 5% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LLY leads at 45. 6% versus 4. 5% for HIMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Eli Lilly and Company — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCS: 47. 1% to $29. 47.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), LLY (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DOCS, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DOCS or LLY or JPM or KO or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

53), 0. 5% yield, +1485% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LLY: +1485%, HIMS: +173. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DOCS and LLY and JPM and KO and HIMS?

These companies operate in different sectors (DOCS (Healthcare) and LLY (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: DOCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LLY is a mega-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. LLY, JPM, KO pay a dividend while DOCS, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.