Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $214M | $331M | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $91M | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $17M | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 48.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -46.8% | 25.4% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 292.0x | 20.1x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $3M | $10.27B |
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies G… (DUOT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Innovative Aerosyst… (ISSC) | 100 | 369.6 | +269.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUOT vs ISSC vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 271.2%, EPS growth 54.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.6%
- 271.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ISSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.59
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.59, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 3.04x
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 271.2% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.56 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.59 vs DUOT's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs DUOT's -15.7%, ROIC 18.8% vs -34.7% |
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 1987.8x DUOT's $25M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUOT's -45.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $91M | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $27M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $17M | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | $13M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +48.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | +25.4% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | +18.8% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +14.6% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.0% | +2.0% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -36.7% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ISSC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, ISSC trades at a 23% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ISSC offers better value at 0.59x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $331M | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $352M | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | 21.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 292.00x | 20.09x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.59x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.79x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.92x | 3.92x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | 5.10x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.69x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISSC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-21 for DUOT. DUOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs ISSC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.5% | +26.0% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.7% | +15.4% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.7% | +18.8% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.4% | +24.8% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.37x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $21M | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $3M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.47x | 12.00x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISSC five years ago would be worth $30,497 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,008 for DUOT. Over the past 12 months, ISSC leads with a +50.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISSC at 39.3% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -1.4% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +50.1% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | +170.4% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +205.0% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +554.4% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +39.3% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DUOT's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ISSC's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 2.59x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.28 | $30.94 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $8.13 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +59.7% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 55.9 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 474K | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOT as "Buy", ISSC as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for DUOT (target: $17) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $23.00 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ISSC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUOT or ISSC or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is the stronger pick with 271. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. (ISSC) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc.
(ISSC) is the cheapest at 21. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. wins at 0. 56x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc.
(ISSC) delivered a total return of +205. 0%, compared to +10. 1% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISSC returned +554. 4% versus DUOT's -58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Duos Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning DUOT is approximately -1464% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is pulling ahead at 271. 2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISSC leads at 44. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 4% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -36. 1% for DUOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUOT or ISSC or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. (ISSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. (ISSC) trades at 20. 1x forward P/E versus 292. 0x for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — 271. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DUOT: 45. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUOT or ISSC or KO?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. DUOT, ISSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUOT or ISSC or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, DUOT: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUOT and ISSC and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUOT (Technology) and ISSC (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while DUOT, ISSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.