Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Aerospace & Defense | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $214M | $331M | $355.61B | $896.00B | $422.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $91M | $49.28B | $280.33B | $191.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $17M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $30.51B |
| Gross Margin | 33.0% | 48.8% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -46.8% | 25.4% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 292.0x | 20.1x | 25.3x | 14.4x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $3M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $231.84B |
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duos Technologies G… (DUOT) | 100 | 253.9 | +153.9% |
| Innovative Aerosyst… (ISSC) | 100 | 369.6 | +269.6% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 235.9 | +135.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DUOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 271.2% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
ISSC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 78.6%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 44.8%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.59, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 3.04x
- PEG 0.56 vs KO's 2.26
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.82 vs 2.26
- Beta 0.86 vs DUOT's 2.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 271.2% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.82 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs DUOT's -45.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs DUOT's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs DUOT's -15.7%, ROIC 18.8% vs -34.7% |
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ISSC leads 2 • BAC leads 1 • DUOT leads 0 • JPM leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 11306.7x DUOT's $25M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DUOT's -45.4%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $91M | $49.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $27M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $40.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $17M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $30.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | $13M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.0% | +48.8% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.8% | +25.4% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.4% | +18.8% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +14.6% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.0% | +2.0% | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -36.7% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ISSC offers better value at 0.59x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $214M | $331M | $355.6B | $896.0B | $422.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $203M | $352M | $390.8B | $1.50T | $556.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.25x | 21.00x | 27.18x | 16.00x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 292.00x | 20.09x | 25.27x | 14.40x | 12.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.59x | 2.43x | 0.90x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.79x | 26.39x | 18.36x | 13.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.92x | 3.92x | 7.42x | 3.20x | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.68x | 5.10x | 10.40x | 2.47x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.69x | 67.15x | 8.88x | 33.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISSC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-21 for DUOT. DUOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.5% | +26.0% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.7% | +15.4% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.7% | +18.8% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.4% | +24.8% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.37x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $21M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $3M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.47x | 12.00x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ISSC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISSC five years ago would be worth $30,497 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,008 for DUOT. Over the past 12 months, ISSC leads with a +50.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ISSC at 39.3% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.1% | -1.4% | +20.3% | -0.5% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +50.1% | +17.2% | +21.8% | +28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.9% | +170.4% | +47.0% | +138.2% | +103.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.1% | +205.0% | +65.6% | +118.2% | +47.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.6% | +554.4% | +121.1% | +465.8% | +368.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +39.3% | +13.7% | +33.6% | +26.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DUOT's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ISSC's 59.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 2.59x | -0.20x | 0.94x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.28 | $30.94 | $84.04 | $337.25 | $57.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.78 | $8.13 | $65.35 | $262.71 | $43.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.4% | +59.7% | +98.3% | +95.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 55.9 | 60.6 | 59.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 628K | 474K | 12.7M | 7.0M | 31.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DUOT as "Buy", ISSC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for DUOT (target: $17) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $23.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 48 | 61 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 56 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% | +5.1% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ISSC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
DUOT vs ISSC vs KO vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is the stronger pick with 271. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. wins at 0. 56x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc.
(ISSC) delivered a total return of +205. 0%, compared to +10. 1% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISSC returned +554. 4% versus DUOT's -58. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Duos Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning DUOT is approximately -1464% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Duos Technologies Group, Inc.
(DUOT) is pulling ahead at 271. 2% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ISSC leads at 44. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -36. 4% for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -36. 1% for DUOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Innovative Aerosystems, Inc. (ISSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 292. 0x for Duos Technologies Group, Inc. — 279. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DUOT: 45. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DUOT, ISSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DUOT or ISSC or KO or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Duos Technologies Group, Inc. (DUOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, DUOT: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DUOT and ISSC and KO and JPM and BAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (DUOT (Technology) and ISSC (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DUOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while DUOT, ISSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.