Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EDSA logo
EDSA
NUVB logo
NUVB
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EDSA
Edesa Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$50M
5Y Perf.-91.1%
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.65B
5Y Perf.-50.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+220.1%

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EDSA logoEDSA
NUVB logoNUVB
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$50M$1.65B$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$143M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-10M$-146M$57.05B
Gross Margin91.6%60.0%
Operating Margin-105.0%25.9%
Forward P/E14.1x
Total Debt$0.00$10M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$11M$164M$343.34B

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EDSA
NUVB
JPM
StockAug 20Jun 26Return
Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA)1008.9-91.1%
Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB)10049.2-50.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100320.1+220.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Edesa Biotech, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EDSA
Edesa Biotech, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

EDSA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +203.8% vs JPM's +19.1%
Best for: momentum
NUVB
Nuvation Bio Inc.
The Growth Play

NUVB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
  • 7.0% revenue growth vs EDSA's -82.2%
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs NUVB's -52.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNUVB logoNUVB7.0% revenue growth vs EDSA's -82.2%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs NUVB's -102.1%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.95 vs NUVB's 2.16
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EDSA logoEDSA+203.8% vs JPM's +19.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs EDSA's -75.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -452.3%

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EDSAEdesa Biotech, Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$211,849
NUVBNuvation Bio Inc.
FY 2025
License
60.8%$38M
Product
39.2%$25M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGNUVB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and EDSA operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUVB's -102.1%.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$143M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$11M-$145M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$10M-$146M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$126M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+91.6%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-105.0%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-102.1%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-88.1%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.7%+106.3%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$50M$1.7B$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$39M$1.5B$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.45x-7.93x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue26.27x3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.58x5.32x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-82 for EDSA. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs EDSA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-82.3%-44.1%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-75.2%-23.8%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.5%-54.3%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-109.6%-42.8%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9245
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$11M-$154M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$164M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$10M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-162.11x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — EDSA and NUVB and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,382 for EDSA. Over the past 12 months, EDSA leads with a +203.8% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 39.9% vs EDSA's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+276.7%-44.5%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+203.8%+116.4%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.9%+173.6%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.2%-59.2%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-52.4%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.3%+39.9%+32.6%
Evenly matched — EDSA and NUVB and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EDSA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EDSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs EDSA's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.18x2.23x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.32$9.75$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.72$1.57$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+48.8%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10034.345.954.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded617K3.9M7.0M
Evenly matched — EDSA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EDSA as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.1% upside for NUVB (target: $13) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEDSA logoEDSAEdesa Biotech, In…NUVB logoNUVBNuvation Bio Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.00$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts2961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EDSA vs NUVB vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EDSA or NUVB or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EDSA or NUVB or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -86. 2% for Edesa Biotech, Inc. (EDSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus EDSA's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EDSA or NUVB or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Edesa Biotech, Inc.

(EDSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning NUVB is approximately -1347% more volatile than EDSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EDSA or NUVB or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.

(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EDSA or NUVB or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -338. 7% for NUVB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EDSA or NUVB or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 173.

1% to $13. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EDSA or NUVB or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. EDSA, NUVB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is EDSA or NUVB or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Edesa Biotech, Inc.

(EDSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18)). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDSA: -99. 3%, NUVB: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EDSA and NUVB and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EDSA (Healthcare) and NUVB (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EDSA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while EDSA, NUVB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.