Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) vs AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) vs Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) vs Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) vs Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BEP | 10.9% revenue growth vs ELLO's -17.1% |
| Value | AXIA | Lower P/E (1.3x vs 19.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | BEP | 3.3% net margin vs AQN's -57.7% |
| Stability / Safety | AQN | Beta 0.44 vs BEPC's 0.80, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BEP | 12.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AQN's 5.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BEPC | +60.2% vs AXIA's +26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BEP | 0.2% ROA vs AQN's -10.0%, ROIC 1.0% vs 2.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ellomay Capital is a renewable energy developer and operator focused on solar photovoltaic plants, hydroelectric storage, and anaerobic digestion facilities across Israel, Spain, and the Netherlands. It generates revenue primarily through electricity sales from its operational power plants—including solar farms, a dual-fuel power plant, and developing pumped storage hydro—with additional income from project development and green gas production. The company's competitive advantage lies in its diversified renewable energy portfolio across multiple geographies and technologies, providing resilience against regional regulatory changes and weather-dependent generation risks.
AXIA Energia is a Brazilian electric utility that generates, transmits, and sells electricity across Brazil. It earns revenue primarily from electricity sales to distributors and large consumers — with generation contributing roughly 70% and transmission about 30% of total revenue. The company's key advantage is its massive hydroelectric portfolio — Brazil's largest — which provides low-cost, renewable baseload power and significant operational scale.
Brookfield Renewable Partners is one of the world's largest publicly traded renewable power platforms, owning and operating hydroelectric, wind, solar, and storage facilities across multiple continents. It generates revenue primarily through long-term power purchase agreements — selling electricity to utilities and corporate customers — with additional income from development activities and asset sales. Its key advantage is scale and diversification across geographies and technologies, backed by Brookfield Asset Management's deep capital and operational expertise.
Brookfield Renewable Corporation is a global owner and operator of renewable power generation assets — primarily hydroelectric, wind, and solar facilities. It generates revenue by selling electricity under long-term power purchase agreements — with hydro (~50%), wind (~30%), and solar (~20%) as its main segments — and through development and asset management fees. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, diversified global portfolio, and access to Brookfield Asset Management's capital and development expertise.
Algonquin Power & Utilities is a diversified utility company that operates both regulated utilities and renewable energy generation assets. It generates revenue through regulated utility services — primarily electric, natural gas, and water distribution — and through selling electricity from its renewable portfolio of hydro, wind, and solar facilities. The company benefits from stable cash flows from its regulated utility operations while capitalizing on growth opportunities in renewable energy development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BEP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AQN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AXIA is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.1B annually — 593.9x ELLO's $44M. BEP is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AQN's -57.7%. On growth, ELLO holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $26.1B | $6.4B | $3.8B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $5.9B | $3.3B | $2.1B | $792M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$479M | $212M | -$877M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $1.7B | -$8.3B | -$1.8B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +50.7% | +44.8% | +59.0% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +19.7% | +13.3% | +23.5% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -1.8% | +3.3% | -23.2% | -57.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +6.3% | -128.7% | -48.2% | +109.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | -83.4% | +9.1% | -10.6% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.1% | -114.1% | +25.3% | +65.3% | -89.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 26.2x trailing earnings, BEPC trades at a 65% valuation discount to AXIA's 74.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BEPC offers better value at 1.06x vs AXIA's 1.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $332M | $23.9B | $9.7B | $6.2B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $898M | $33.9B | $42.5B | $19.9B | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.05x | 74.24x | -471.51x | 26.21x | -3.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.34x | — | — | 19.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x | — | 1.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.43x | 52.85x | 12.72x | 8.77x | 13.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.95x | 16.53x | 1.49x | 1.49x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 1.01x | 0.26x | 0.51x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 178.31x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEP delivers a 0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-27 for AQN. AXIA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ELLO's 4.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEPC scores 7/9 vs ELLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.6% | -0.4% | +0.6% | -8.3% | -26.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -0.2% | +0.2% | -1.9% | -10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +2.6% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +2.7% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.03x | 0.64x | 1.00x | 1.16x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $480M | $51.7B | $32.7B | $13.7B | $6.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $26.6B | $2.1B | $392M | $35M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $521M | $78.2B | $34.8B | $14.1B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 1.41x | 0.35x | 0.60x | 1.29x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth $13,122 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,015 for AQN. Over the past 12 months, BEPC leads with a +60.2% total return vs AXIA's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELLO at 24.4% vs AQN's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | +30.6% | +15.2% | +8.1% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.1% | +26.0% | +49.6% | +60.2% | +51.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.7% | +28.3% | +38.2% | +68.9% | +6.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.0% | +31.2% | -9.6% | +7.4% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.9% | -92.7% | +214.6% | +76.7% | +55.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.4% | +8.7% | +11.4% | +19.1% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
AQN is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEPC's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AQN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ELLO's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | — | 0.73x | 0.80x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.34 | $12.66 | $32.72 | $45.10 | $7.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.00 | $7.06 | $19.29 | $23.73 | $4.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +95.4% | +97.1% | +94.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 67.4 | 70.9 | 63.2 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 1.6M | 446K | 783K | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AXIA as "Buy", BEP as "Buy", BEPC as "Buy", AQN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for BEP (target: $35) vs -15.8% for BEPC (target: $36). For income investors, BEP offers the higher dividend yield at 12.72% vs AXIA's 0.17%.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | AXIAAXIA Energia S.A. | BEPBrookfield Renewa… | BEPCBrookfield Renewa… | AQNAlgonquin Power &… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $34.63 | $36.00 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 20 | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +12.7% | — | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | $4.04 | — | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | 100 | 96.4 | -3.6% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | 100 | 100 | +0.0% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | 109.7 | 143.52 | +30.8% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 100 | 47.35 | -52.7% |
Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) returned -10% over 5 years vs Algonquin Power & U… (AQN)'s -40%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | $12M | $40M | +230.6% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | $9.7B | $7.5B | -23.5% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | $2.5B | $6.5B | +165.9% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | $2.0B | $4.1B | +103.5% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | $815M | $2.3B | +184.5% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | -4.7% | -16.1% | -243.0% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 10.1% | 25.8% | +156.1% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | -0.9% | -0.3% | +65.4% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | -0.3% | 5.7% | +2032.7% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 11.9% | -59.5% | -598.2% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | 78.2 | 87.9 | +12.4% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 6.5 | 20.7 | +218.5% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | 6.7 | 17 | +153.7% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 30.2 | 210.7 | +597.7% |
Ellomay Capital Ltd. has traded in a 17x–88x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-40x. AXIA Energia S.A. has traded in a 7x–26x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~74x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | -0.06 | -0.51 | -793.2% |
| AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) | 0.72 | 0.84 | +16.7% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEP) | -0.15 | -0.07 | +55.1% |
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | -0.02 | 1.63 | +8416.3% |
| Algonquin Power & U… (AQN) | 0.33 | -1.81 | -648.5% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ellomay Capital Ltd. generated $-67M FCF in 2024 (+0% vs 2021). AXIA Energia S.A. generated $691M FCF in 2024 (-53% vs 2021).
ELLO vs AXIA vs BEP vs BEPC vs AQN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN a better buy right now?
Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) offers the better valuation at 26.2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN?
On trailing P/E, Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) is the cheapest at 26.2x versus AXIA Energia S.A. at 74.2x. On forward P/E, AXIA Energia S.A. is actually cheaper at 1.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN?
Over the past 5 years, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) delivered a total return of +31.2%, compared to -39.8% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN). A $10,000 investment in AXIA five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BEP returned +214.6% versus AXIA's -92.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.44β versus Brookfield Renewable Corporation's 0.80β — meaning BEPC is approximately 83% more volatile than AQN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 4% for Ellomay Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN?
AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) is the more profitable company, earning 25.8% net margin versus -59.5% for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. — meaning it keeps 25.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AXIA leads at 34.5% versus 13.4% for BEP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AQN leads at 74.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AXIA Energia S.A. (AXIA) trades at 1.3x forward P/E versus 19.2x for Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. — 17.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BEP: 9.0% to $34.63.
07Which pays a better dividend — ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN?
In this comparison, BEP (12.7% yield), AQN (5.6% yield), AXIA (0.2% yield) pay a dividend. ELLO, BEPC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ELLO or AXIA or BEP or BEPC or AQN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.44), 5.6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AQN: +55.5%, AXIA: -92.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ELLO and AXIA and BEP and BEPC and AQN?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: ELLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BEPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AQN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BEP, AQN pay a dividend while ELLO, AXIA, BEPC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.