Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ENGN logo
ENGN
JANX logo
JANX
JPM logo
JPM
IMVT logo
IMVT
FATE logo
FATE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ENGN
enGene Holdings Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$83M
5Y Perf.-78.9%
JANX
Janux Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$827M
5Y Perf.+55.3%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+105.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.-14.1%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$240M
5Y Perf.-17.3%

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ENGN logoENGN
JANX logoJANX
JPM logoJPM
IMVT logoIMVT
FATE logoFATE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$83M$827M$896.00B$6.90B$240M
Revenue (TTM)$22M$280.33B$0.00$6M
Net Income (TTM)$-122M$-114M$57.05B$-506M$-130M
Gross Margin54.1%60.0%53.8%
Operating Margin-7.3%25.9%-22.1%
Forward P/E14.4x
Total Debt$32M$22M$942.38B$72K$78M
Cash & Equiv.$50M$52M$343.34B$902M$47M

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ENGN
JANX
JPM
IMVT
FATE
StockNov 23Jun 26Return
enGene Holdings Inc. (ENGN)10021.1-78.9%
Janux Therapeutics,… (JANX)100155.3+55.3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100205.5+105.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)10085.9-14.1%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)10082.7-17.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Immunovant, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
ENGN
enGene Holdings Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

ENGN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JANX
Janux Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

JANX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.41, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 39.04x
  • Beta 1.41, current ratio 39.04x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs ENGN's -77.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +110.9% vs ENGN's -50.2%
Best for: momentum
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs ENGN's -77.3%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs FATE's -20.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs ENGN's 2.26
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+110.9% vs ENGN's -50.2%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ENGNenGene Holdings Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JANXJanux Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.6%.

MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$22M$280.3B$0$6M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$127M-$155M$81.4B-$532M-$127M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$122M-$114M$57.0B-$506M-$130M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$104M-$78M$100.9B-$407M-$108M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.1%+60.0%+53.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.3%+25.9%-22.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.3%+20.4%-20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%+36.0%-17.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.3%-2.6%+16.0%-14.1%+18.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ENGN and JPM and IMVT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$83M$827M$896.0B$6.9B$240M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$65M$797M$1.50T$6.0B$271M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.71x-7.41x16.00x-12.14x-1.79x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue82.69x3.20x36.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.49x0.88x2.47x7.19x1.18x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x
Evenly matched — ENGN and JPM and IMVT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs JANX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-55.8%-11.8%+15.9%-68.2%-58.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.7%-11.2%+1.3%-62.2%-39.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-67.4%-15.3%+4.5%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-50.7%-15.6%+8.9%-68.3%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–911522
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.02x2.60x0.00x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$18M-$30M$599.0B-$902M$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$50M$52M$343.3B$902M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$32M$22M$942.4B$72,000$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-40.18x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $229 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs ENGN's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs ENGN's -56.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-81.7%-0.7%-0.5%+29.8%+108.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.2%-46.9%+21.8%+110.9%+47.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%+4.4%+138.2%+55.0%-61.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%-32.7%+118.2%+213.0%-97.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.9%-46.1%+465.8%+237.9%+15.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-56.7%+1.4%+33.6%+15.7%-27.5%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENGN's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs ENGN's 13.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x1.41x0.94x1.66x1.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.25$35.34$337.25$36.27$2.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.40$12.12$262.71$14.32$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+13.2%+38.4%+95.1%+92.7%+71.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.844.459.157.947.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.9M884K7.0M1.9M3.2M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ENGN as "Hold", JANX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 332.1% upside for ENGN (target: $7) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricENGN logoENGNenGene Holdings I…JANX logoJANXJanux Therapeutic…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$23.40$339.75$43.67$5.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts915612331
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%+3.9%0.0%0.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ENGN vs JANX vs JPM vs IMVT vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Janux Therapeutics, Inc. (JANX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -97. 7% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus ENGN's -91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus enGene Holdings Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning ENGN is approximately 139% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fate Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 29. 9% year-over-year, compared to -56. 8% for enGene Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JANX leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JANX leads at 79. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENGN: 332.

1% to $7. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. ENGN, JANX, IMVT, FATE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is ENGN or JANX or JPM or IMVT or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). enGene Holdings Inc. (ENGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ENGN: -91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between ENGN and JANX and JPM and IMVT and FATE?

These companies operate in different sectors (ENGN (Healthcare) and JANX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and IMVT (Healthcare) and FATE (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ENGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JANX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JPM pays a dividend while ENGN, JANX, IMVT, FATE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.