Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $271M | $3.05B | $402.80B | $191.70B | $63.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $61.16B | $37.24B | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-2M | $4.23B | $7.80B | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 70.2% | 71.5% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | 26.7% | 31.6% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 122.5x | 16.0x | 15.9x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $719K | $6M | $69.07B | $54.60B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $43M | $5.23B | $9.13B | $3.12B |
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equillium, Inc. (EQ) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 232.0 | +132.0% |
| Amgen Inc. (AMGN) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 98.2 | -1.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +6.3% vs REGN's +18.0%
ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
- 362.2% 10Y total return vs AMGN's 178.4%
- Beta 0.14, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.14 vs ARQT's 1.45
Among these 5 stocks, AMGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.08 vs AMGN's 5.39
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 15.9x), PEG 2.08 vs 5.39
- 29.6% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 15.9x), PEG 2.08 vs 5.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs ARQT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs ARQT's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 43-year raise streak, vs AMGN's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs REGN's +18.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs EQ's -53.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs -88.8% |
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • EQ leads 1 • ARQT leads 0 • AMGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ARQT and ABBV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and EQ operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $61.2B | $37.2B | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $6M | $24.5B | $15.6B | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$2M | $4.2B | $7.8B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $27M | $18.7B | $8.6B | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +70.2% | +71.5% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | +26.7% | +31.6% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | +6.9% | +20.9% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | +30.6% | +23.1% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +10.0% | +5.8% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | +55.0% | +57.4% | +4.4% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
REGN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 85% valuation discount to ABBV's 96.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.33x vs AMGN's 8.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $3.0B | $402.8B | $191.7B | $63.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $3.0B | $466.6B | $237.2B | $63.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.21x | -187.54x | 96.09x | 24.96x | 14.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.45x | 15.96x | 15.87x | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 8.49x | 2.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 16.53x | 14.97x | 15.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.11x | 6.59x | 5.22x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.03x | 16.37x | — | 22.24x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.61x | 23.67x | 15.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ABBV and REGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-61 for EQ. EQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMGN scores 7/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | -1.4% | +62.1% | +89.4% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.7% | -0.6% | +3.1% | +8.6% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.8% | -5.2% | +23.9% | +14.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.1% | -4.3% | +21.5% | +16.0% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.03x | — | 6.31x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$37M | $63.8B | $45.5B | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $43M | $5.2B | $9.1B | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719,000 | $6M | $69.1B | $54.6B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | 3.28x | 5.02x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $22,367 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,691 for EQ. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +627.0% total return vs REGN's +18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs REGN's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.7% | -15.9% | +0.8% | +10.0% | -20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +627.0% | +80.6% | +21.9% | +22.8% | +18.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.8% | +138.8% | +79.3% | +76.2% | -18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.1% | -16.2% | +123.7% | +65.2% | +16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | +11.8% | +362.2% | +178.4% | +68.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.2% | +33.7% | +21.5% | +20.8% | -6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARQT's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs REGN's 74.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.45x | 0.14x | 0.53x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $31.77 | $244.81 | $391.29 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $12.72 | $181.73 | $267.83 | $503.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +76.7% | +93.0% | +90.8% | +74.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 66.4 | 62.8 | 61.2 | 37.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 565K | 1.5M | 4.6M | 2.4M | 868K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", AMGN as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.4% upside for EQ (target: $6) vs -1.8% for AMGN (target: $349). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs REGN's 0.56%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $34.00 | $256.92 | $348.80 | $836.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 41 | 38 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.9% | +2.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 43 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 | $9.45 | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +6.2% |
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). REGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
EQ vs ARQT vs ABBV vs AMGN vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 96. 1x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 08x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 39x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +123. 7%, compared to -53. 1% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +362. 2% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning ARQT is approximately 963% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equillium, Inc. (EQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 08x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 39x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQ: 122. 4% to $6. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield), AMGN (2. 7% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. EQ, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EQ or ARQT or ABBV or AMGN or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, ARQT: +11. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQ and ARQT and ABBV and AMGN and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AMGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ABBV, AMGN, REGN pay a dividend while EQ, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.