Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $271M | $491M | $6.90B | $3.05B | $402.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $416M | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-175M | $-506M | $-2M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 90.9% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | 0.8% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 122.5x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $719K | $27M | $72K | $6M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $83M | $902M | $43M | $5.23B |
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equillium, Inc. (EQ) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 232.0 | +132.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
- Beta 0.58, current ratio 10.32x
- +6.3% vs ABBV's +21.9%
CABA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 43 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.9%
- 362.2% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 237.9%
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 122.5x)
- 6.9% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 122.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs ARQT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs CABA's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 43-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs ABBV's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CABA's -96.5%, ROIC 23.9% vs -429.6% |
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 5 of 6 categories
EQ leads 1 • CABA leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • ARQT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ABBV is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $416M | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$178M | -$532M | $6M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$175M | -$506M | -$2M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$143M | -$407M | $27M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +90.9% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +0.8% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | -0.6% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +6.5% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +60.1% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | +46.6% | -14.1% | +55.0% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $491M | $6.9B | $3.0B | $402.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $435M | $6.0B | $3.0B | $466.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.21x | -1.84x | -12.14x | -187.54x | 96.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 122.45x | 15.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 16.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 8.11x | 6.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.03x | 2.75x | 7.19x | 16.37x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 22.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-132 for CABA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CABA's 0.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs CABA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | -131.6% | -68.2% | -1.4% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.7% | -96.5% | -62.2% | -0.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.8% | -4.3% | — | -5.2% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.1% | -126.2% | -68.3% | -4.3% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.24x | 0.00x | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$56M | -$902M | -$37M | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $83M | $902M | $43M | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719,000 | $27M | $72,000 | $6M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -73.78x | — | 2.08x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,583 for CABA. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +627.0% total return vs ABBV's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs CABA's -37.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.7% | +36.2% | +29.8% | -15.9% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +627.0% | +67.2% | +110.9% | +80.6% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.8% | -75.6% | +55.0% | +138.8% | +79.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.1% | -64.2% | +213.0% | -16.2% | +123.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | -69.9% | +237.9% | +11.8% | +362.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.2% | -37.5% | +15.7% | +33.7% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CABA's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABBV currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs CABA's 71.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 2.02x | 1.66x | 1.45x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $4.23 | $36.27 | $31.77 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $1.26 | $14.32 | $12.72 | $181.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +71.2% | +92.7% | +76.7% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 35.9 | 57.9 | 66.4 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 565K | 3.6M | 1.9M | 1.5M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", CABA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 442.5% upside for CABA (target: $16) vs 12.8% for ABBV (target: $257). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 2.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $16.33 | $43.67 | $34.00 | $256.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 23 | 12 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | 43 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ABBV leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EQ leads in 1 (Total Returns).
EQ vs CABA vs IMVT vs ARQT vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) offers the better valuation at 96. 1x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -64. 2% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +362. 2% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Cabaletta Bio, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning CABA is approximately 1382% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 24% for Cabaletta Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 106. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CABA: 442. 5% to $16. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. EQ, CABA, IMVT, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EQ or CABA or IMVT or ARQT or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 9% yield, +362. 2% 10Y return). Cabaletta Bio, Inc. (CABA) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +362. 2%, CABA: -69. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQ and CABA and IMVT and ARQT and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CABA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while EQ, CABA, IMVT, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.