Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
EQ logo
EQ
IMVT logo
IMVT
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EQ vs IMVT vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EQ
Equillium, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$271M
5Y Perf.-4.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.75B
5Y Perf.+36.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+218.2%

EQ vs IMVT vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EQ logoEQ
IMVT logoIMVT
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$271M$6.75B$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-506M$57.05B
Gross Margin60.0%
Operating Margin25.9%
Forward P/E14.1x
Total Debt$719K$72K$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$902M$343.34B

EQ vs IMVT vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EQ
IMVT
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Equillium, Inc. (EQ)10095.3-4.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100136.8+36.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100318.2+218.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EQ vs IMVT vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Equillium, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
EQ
Equillium, Inc.
The Income Pick

EQ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.50
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
  • Beta 0.50, current ratio 10.32x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Secondary Option

IMVT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 230.5%
  • 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJPM logoJPM3.3% NII/revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs EQ's 2.6%
Stability / SafetyEQ logoEQBeta 0.50 vs IMVT's 1.67
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)EQ logoEQ+6.3% vs JPM's +19.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

EQ vs IMVT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EQEquillium, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

EQ vs IMVT vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEQLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EQ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$20M-$532M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$506M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$407M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.0%-14.1%+16.0%
EQ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IMVT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$271M$6.8B$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$241M$5.8B$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.21x-11.87x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.03x7.04x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
Evenly matched — IMVT and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-61.4%-68.2%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-53.7%-62.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-88.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-98.1%-68.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9125
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.00x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M-$902M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$902M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$719,000$72,000$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,584 for EQ. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +628.0% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs IMVT's 14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+83.7%+26.9%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+628.0%+103.6%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+295.8%+51.6%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.2%+207.0%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%+230.5%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+58.2%+14.9%+32.6%
EQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs EQ's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.50x1.67x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.43$36.27$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$14.32$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.9%+90.6%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.551.954.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded559K1.9M7.0M
Evenly matched — EQ and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: EQ as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 122.4% upside for EQ (target: $6) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricEQ logoEQEquillium, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.25$43.67$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts122361
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

EQ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). JPM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallEquillium, Inc. (EQ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EQ vs IMVT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EQ or IMVT or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equillium, Inc. (EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or IMVT or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -54. 2% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — EQ or IMVT or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equillium, Inc.

(EQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning IMVT is approximately 236% more volatile than EQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — EQ or IMVT or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -100. 0% for Equillium, Inc. (EQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — EQ or IMVT or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is EQ or IMVT or JPM more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQ: 122.

4% to $6. 25.

07

Which pays a better dividend — EQ or IMVT or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. EQ, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is EQ or IMVT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, IMVT: +230. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between EQ and IMVT and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (EQ (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while EQ, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.