Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EQ vs RAPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
EQ vs RAPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $271M | $296M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-106M |
| Total Debt | $719K | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $170M |
EQ vs RAPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equillium, Inc. (EQ) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| RAPT Therapeutics, … (RAPT) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQ vs RAPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.50
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.32x
- Beta 0.50, current ratio 10.32x
RAPT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth -4.6%
- -44.2% 10Y total return vs EQ's -79.9%
- 1.5% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs EQ's -100.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs RAPT's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.3% vs RAPT's +5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -53.7% ROA vs RAPT's -54.7%, ROIC -88.8% vs -155.7% |
EQ vs RAPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQ and RAPT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.0% | +82.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EQ and RAPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $296M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $130M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.21x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.03x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RAPT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQ delivers a -61.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-62 for RAPT. RAPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQ's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RAPT scores 2/9 vs EQ's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.4% | -61.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -53.7% | -54.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.8% | -155.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.1% | -79.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$165M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719,000 | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EQ five years ago would be worth $4,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,904 for RAPT. Over the past 12 months, EQ leads with a +628.0% total return vs RAPT's +559.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQ at 58.2% vs RAPT's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +83.7% | +82.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +628.0% | +559.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.8% | -64.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.2% | -61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | -44.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.2% | -29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EQ and RAPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQ is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAPT's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAPT currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs EQ's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.43 | $58.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $6.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.9% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.5 | 78.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 559K | 10.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EQ as "Buy" and RAPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 122.4% upside for EQ (target: $6) vs -0.0% for RAPT (target: $58).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.25 | $58.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RAPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EQ leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
EQ vs RAPT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQ or RAPT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Equillium, Inc.
(EQ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EQ or RAPT?
Over the past 5 years, Equillium, Inc.
(EQ) delivered a total return of -54. 2%, compared to -61. 0% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. (RAPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RAPT returned -44. 2% versus EQ's -79. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EQ or RAPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equillium, Inc.
(EQ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning RAPT is approximately 25% more volatile than EQ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. (RAPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Equillium, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EQ or RAPT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS -4. 6% year-over-year, compared to -69. 6% for Equillium, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EQ or RAPT?
Equillium, Inc.
(EQ) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQ leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RAPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQ leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EQ or RAPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EQ or RAPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equillium, Inc.
(EQ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQ: -79. 9%, RAPT: -44. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EQ and RAPT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.