Leisure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Specialty Retail
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $256M | $2.31B | $14.38B | $48M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $240M | $545M | $6.29B | $1.22B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $101M | $59M | $-51M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 53.0% | 41.8% | 30.0% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 23.4% | 0.6% | -1.1% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 19.5x | 122.9x | — | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $26M | $1.93B | $427M | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $96M | $1.60B | $2M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalade, Incorpora… (ESCA) | 100 | 133.5 | +33.5% |
| Monarch Casino & Re… (MCRI) | 100 | 378.6 | +278.6% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 8.6 | -91.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.87, yield 3.2%, current ratio 4.28x
- 3.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MCRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- PEG 0.57 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (19.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.57 vs 2.26
- Beta 0.55 vs SPWH's 1.62, lower leverage
DKNG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5%
Among these 6 stocks, SPWH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 27.8% margin vs SPWH's -4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs ESCA's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.5x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.57 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SPWH's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SPWH's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.9% vs SPWH's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs SPWH's -5.9%, ROIC 21.8% vs -1.6% |
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • MCRI leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • ESCA leads 0 • DKNG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1165.8x ESCA's $240M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWH's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $240M | $545M | $6.3B | $1.2B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25M | $182M | $313M | $25M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $101M | $59M | -$51M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $128M | $679M | $13M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +53.0% | +41.8% | +30.0% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +23.4% | +0.6% | -1.1% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +18.6% | +0.9% | -4.2% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +23.6% | +10.8% | +1.1% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.6% | +4.1% | +16.8% | +2.8% | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.2% | -8.1% | +157.7% | 0.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 41% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCRI offers better value at 0.70x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $256M | $2.3B | $14.4B | $48M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $264M | $2.2B | $14.7B | $473M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.82x | 23.76x | -3580.25x | -0.95x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.25x | 19.52x | 122.88x | — | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.70x | — | — | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.11x | 11.70x | 56.63x | 18.80x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.07x | 4.23x | 2.37x | 0.04x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 4.50x | 22.77x | 0.25x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.00x | 17.97x | 22.20x | 5.40x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCRI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-26 for SPWH. MCRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESCA scores 8/9 vs SPWH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +18.7% | +7.9% | -26.2% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +14.2% | +1.3% | -5.9% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +21.8% | -0.9% | -1.6% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +24.7% | -0.6% | -2.6% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.05x | 3.06x | 2.26x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$71M | $330M | $425M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $96M | $1.6B | $2M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $26M | $1.9B | $427M | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 225.55x | 4.48x | -2.69x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $688 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, MCRI leads with a +53.9% total return vs SPWH's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs SPWH's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.3% | +35.0% | -18.7% | -15.8% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.2% | +53.9% | -23.6% | -70.1% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.9% | +91.6% | +13.9% | -74.9% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.6% | +98.1% | -42.7% | -93.1% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.9% | +515.7% | +195.9% | -84.7% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.4% | +24.2% | +4.4% | -37.0% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCRI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCRI currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 28.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.55x | 0.87x | 1.62x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.32 | $130.85 | $48.78 | $4.33 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.41 | $82.18 | $20.46 | $1.08 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +98.6% | +59.5% | +28.4% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.5 | 74.5 | 72.1 | 43.0 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 136K | 12.1M | 796K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ESCA and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESCA as "Buy", MCRI as "Hold", DKNG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.3% upside for DKNG (target: $36) vs -19.0% for MCRI (target: $105). For income investors, ESCA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs MCRI's 0.91%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $104.50 | $35.75 | — | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 | 48 | — | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +0.9% | — | — | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.17 | — | — | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +3.2% | +5.8% | +0.4% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
KO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ESCA vs MCRI vs DKNG vs SPWH vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. wins at 0. 57x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -93. 1% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCRI returned +515. 7% versus SPWH's -84. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 62β — meaning SPWH is approximately -911% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -4. 5% for Escalade, Incorporated (ESCA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -1. 2% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. (MCRI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 57x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 122. 9x for DraftKings Inc. — 108. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 23. 3% to $35. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, ESCA (3.
2% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), MCRI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DKNG, SPWH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESCA or MCRI or DKNG or SPWH or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, SPWH: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESCA and MCRI and DKNG and SPWH and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESCA (Consumer Cyclical) and MCRI (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and SPWH (Consumer Cyclical) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESCA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ESCA, MCRI, JPM, KO pay a dividend while DKNG, SPWH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.