ESP vs LHX vs KO

For growth investors, Espey Mfg.

& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Espey Mfg.

& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. at 34. 6x. On forward P/E, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. wins at 0. 37x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Espey Mfg.

& Electronics Corp. (ESP) delivered a total return of +333. 5%, compared to +45. 2% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LHX returned +299. 1% versus KO's +115. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

23β versus Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. 's 0. 74β — meaning ESP is approximately -416% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Espey Mfg.

& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. grew EPS 31. 9% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESP leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 7. 3% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 10. 0% for LHX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LHX: 17. 8% to $347. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 6% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

23), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, ESP: +167. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ESP (Industrials) and LHX (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.