Electrical Equipment & Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Banks - Diversified
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense | Banks - Diversified | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $183M | $5.01B | $908.57B | $12.29B | $10.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $1.18B | $280.33B | $3.69B | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $63M | $57.05B | $290M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 12.2% | 60.0% | 24.2% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 9.9% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 49.9x | 14.6x | 35.7x | 70.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $343M | $942.38B | $470M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $69M | $343.34B | $647M | $561M |
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Espey Mfg. & Electr… (ESP) | 100 | 352.0 | +252.0% |
| VSE Corporation (VSEC) | 100 | 698.4 | +598.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) | 100 | 704.6 | +604.6% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 346.8 | +246.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.37 vs DRS's 2.84
- Beta 0.74, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.66x
- 25.5% margin vs KTOS's 2.1%
- Beta 0.74 vs VSEC's 2.25
VSEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +61.7% vs DRS's +5.0%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 70.9x)
- 1.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ESP's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
DRS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 36.6% 10Y total return vs VSEC's 5.3%
KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.06x
- 18.5% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs VSEC's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 70.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.5% margin vs KTOS's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs VSEC's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ESP's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.7% vs DRS's +5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs KTOS's 1.0%, ROIC 17.7% vs 1.4% |
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
ESP leads 1 • VSEC leads 1 • DRS leads 0 • KTOS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 6635.3x ESP's $42M. ESP is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KTOS's 2.1%. On growth, VSEC holds the edge at +26.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $1.2B | $280.3B | $3.7B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $170M | $81.4B | $436M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $63M | $57.0B | $290M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$14M | $100.9B | $397M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +12.2% | +60.0% | +24.2% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +10.7% | +25.9% | +9.9% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +5.3% | +20.4% | +7.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | -1.1% | +36.0% | +10.7% | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +26.8% | — | +5.9% | +22.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +3.4% | +16.0% | +21.1% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 96% valuation discount to KTOS's 417.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ESP offers better value at 0.46x vs DRS's 3.56x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $5.0B | $908.6B | $12.3B | $10.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $164M | $5.3B | $1.51T | $12.1B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.19x | 86.99x | 16.22x | 44.74x | 417.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.17x | 49.90x | 14.60x | 35.72x | 70.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — | 0.92x | 3.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.09x | 32.04x | 18.52x | 27.47x | 112.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 4.51x | 3.25x | 3.37x | 7.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | 3.23x | 2.51x | 4.54x | 4.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 877.75x | 9.01x | 54.15x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ESP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESP delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $1 for KTOS. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRS scores 7/9 vs KTOS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +4.1% | +15.9% | +10.8% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +3.0% | +1.3% | +6.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +5.9% | +4.5% | +10.5% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +7.7% | +8.9% | +10.8% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x | 2.60x | 0.17x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $273M | $599.0B | -$177M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $69M | $343.3B | $647M | $561M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $343M | $942.4B | $470M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.72x | 0.74x | 40.86x | 6.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VSEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VSEC five years ago would be worth $44,196 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,565 for KTOS. Over the past 12 months, VSEC leads with a +61.7% total return vs DRS's +5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VSEC at 60.0% vs JPM's 33.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | +21.0% | +0.8% | +33.0% | -31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.2% | +61.7% | +20.9% | +5.0% | +28.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.2% | +309.7% | +138.8% | +175.0% | +294.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +333.5% | +342.0% | +135.5% | +263.9% | +105.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.4% | +528.9% | +481.2% | +3659.7% | +1238.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.7% | +60.0% | +33.7% | +40.1% | +58.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ESP and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESP is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSEC's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 40.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 2.25x | 0.87x | 1.15x | 2.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.77 | $232.61 | $338.09 | $50.59 | $134.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.00 | $123.69 | $269.72 | $32.43 | $39.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +94.2% | +96.2% | +91.1% | +40.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 64.4 | 72.1 | 52.5 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 466K | 7.4M | 879K | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESP as "Hold", VSEC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", DRS as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.9% upside for KTOS (target: $110) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.83% vs VSEC's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $247.00 | $339.75 | $53.33 | $110.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 11 | 61 | 9 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.2% | +1.8% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.96 | $0.39 | $5.95 | $0.36 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ESP leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ESP vs VSEC vs JPM vs DRS vs KTOS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate VSE Corporation (VSEC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 417. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. wins at 0. 37x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 84x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
Over the past 5 years, VSE Corporation (VSEC) delivered a total return of +342.
0%, compared to +105. 7% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DRS returned +36. 6% versus ESP's +167. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus VSE Corporation's 2. 25β — meaning VSEC is approximately 205% more volatile than ESP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 3. 0% for VSE Corporation (VSEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VSE Corporation grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSEC leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 1. 6% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 2. 1% for KTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 37x versus Leonardo DRS, Inc. 's 2. 84x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 70. 9x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 56. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 102. 9% to $110. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield), ESP (1. 6% yield), DRS (0. 8% yield), VSEC (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESP or VSEC or JPM or DRS or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). VSE Corporation (VSEC) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, VSEC: +528. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESP and VSEC and JPM and DRS and KTOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESP (Industrials) and VSEC (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and DRS (Industrials) and KTOS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VSEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; DRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ESP, JPM, DRS pay a dividend while VSEC, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.