Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EVMN vs RAPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
EVMN vs RAPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $652M | $296M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-69M | $-106M |
| Gross Margin | 89.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $170M |
Quick Verdict: EVMN vs RAPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVMN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 85.7%, EPS growth 4.0%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs RAPT's -44.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 8.57x
RAPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 0.63
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 4.87x
- Beta 0.63 vs EVMN's 1.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 85.7% revenue growth vs RAPT's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs EVMN's 1.74 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs EVMN's +6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -54.7% ROA vs EVMN's -59.7%, ROIC -155.7% vs -61.9% |
EVMN vs RAPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVMN and RAPT operate at a comparable scale, with $13M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$69M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | -$87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.8% | +82.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EVMN and RAPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $652M | $296M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $610M | $130M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.49x | -2.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 50.17x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.17x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EVMN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RAPT delivers a -61.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-62 in annual profit, vs $-2 for EVMN. EVMN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RAPT's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EVMN scores 4/9 vs RAPT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -61.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.7% | -54.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -61.9% | -155.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.6% | -79.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$42M | -$165M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10043.71x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EVMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EVMN five years ago would be worth $10,638 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,904 for RAPT. Over the past 12 months, RAPT leads with a +559.1% total return vs EVMN's +6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EVMN at 2.1% vs RAPT's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.5% | +82.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.4% | +559.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -64.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -61.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.4% | -44.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RAPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVMN's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAPT currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs EVMN's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.20 | $58.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.88 | $6.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.3% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 78.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 355K | 10.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EVMN as "Buy" and RAPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 133.9% upside for EVMN (target: $48) vs -0.0% for RAPT (target: $58).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.40 | $58.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RAPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). EVMN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
EVMN vs RAPT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVMN or RAPT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Evommune, Inc.
(EVMN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — EVMN or RAPT?
Over the past 5 years, Evommune, Inc.
(EVMN) delivered a total return of +6. 4%, compared to -61. 0% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. (RAPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EVMN returned +6. 4% versus RAPT's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — EVMN or RAPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Evommune, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning EVMN is approximately 178% more volatile than RAPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Evommune, Inc. (EVMN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — EVMN or RAPT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Evommune, Inc.
grew EPS 4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — EVMN or RAPT?
RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -529. 8% for Evommune, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAPT leads at 0. 0% versus -623. 6% for EVMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EVMN leads at 89. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — EVMN or RAPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is EVMN or RAPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RAPT Therapeutics, Inc.
(RAPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63)). Evommune, Inc. (EVMN) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAPT: -44. 2%, EVMN: +6. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between EVMN and RAPT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EVMN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.