Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) vs Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) vs EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Antero Resources Corporation (AR) vs Range Resources Corporation (RRC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EXE | 187.2% revenue growth vs AR's 28.1% |
| Value | INR | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 11.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | EQT | 23.6% net margin vs INR's -0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | EXE | Beta 0.49 vs INR's 1.05 |
| Dividends | EXE | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EQT's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EQT | +28.8% vs INR's -7.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RRC | 8.9% ROA vs INR's -0.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Expand Energy Corporation is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on unconventional natural gas resources in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales — with additional contributions from oil and natural gas liquids — through its extensive portfolio of approximately 5,000 wells across key shale plays like the Marcellus and Haynesville formations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-scale, low-cost position in premier natural gas basins and its operational expertise in unconventional resource development.
Infinity Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on developing shale resources in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids extracted from its Utica and Marcellus shale acreage in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated acreage position in prolific shale plays — particularly its approximately 63,000 net acres in the Utica Shale — which provides operational scale and resource density.
EQT Corporation is America's largest natural gas producer, focused on developing and operating natural gas assets primarily in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue through the sale of natural gas (~85% of revenue) and natural gas liquids (~15%), with production concentrated in the prolific Marcellus and Utica shale formations. The company's competitive advantage stems from its massive, low-cost reserve base—it holds the largest natural gas position in the U.S.—and its operational scale in the most productive gas region.
Antero Resources is an independent natural gas and natural gas liquids producer focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales (~60% of revenue), natural gas liquids sales (~35%), and oil sales (~5%), with its production heavily weighted toward liquids-rich gas. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, contiguous acreage position in the Marcellus and Utica shale plays — which provides operational efficiency and significant low-cost reserves.
Range Resources Corporation is an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (~70% of revenue), natural gas liquids (~20%), and oil and condensate (~10%) to utilities, midstream companies, and industrial users. The company's key advantage is its large, low-cost position in the prolific Marcellus Shale — one of North America's most productive natural gas basins — with extensive acreage and established infrastructure.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
EQT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). EXE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EXE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 39.3x INR's $308M. EQT is the more profitable business, keeping 23.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INR's -0.6%. On growth, RRC holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $308M | $8.6B | $4.9B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.3B | $76M | $5.8B | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | -$2M | $2.0B | $548M | $658M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$124M | $2.8B | $1.3B | $926M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.4% | +53.0% | +97.4% | +19.4% | +19.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | -4.6% | +36.7% | +11.9% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | -0.6% | +23.6% | +11.1% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | -40.2% | +32.9% | +26.6% | +13.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.7% | +15.1% | +2.0% | +19.4% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | -80.8% | +56.5% | +4.7% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, INR trades at a 75% valuation discount to AR's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXE's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INR's 4486.8x.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25.7B | $751.1B | $38.3B | $11.4B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.1B | $751.4B | $46.0B | $14.9B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.26x | 4.46x | 16.16x | 18.13x | 15.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.05x | 6.08x | 12.92x | 11.26x | 11.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.00x | 4486.84x | 7.51x | 9.11x | 9.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 2899.82x | 4.43x | 2.15x | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.43x | 1.37x | 1.49x | 2.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.98x | — | 13.51x | 6.96x | 16.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-0 for INR. EQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AR scores 9/9 vs INR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | -0.2% | +7.5% | +7.3% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | -0.2% | +4.9% | +4.2% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +10.1% | +7.7% | +5.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +13.3% | +9.2% | +7.6% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.51x | 0.29x | 0.46x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$616M | $259M | $7.7B | $3.5B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $616M | $2M | $111M | — | $204,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $261M | $7.8B | $3.5B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.91x | -0.49x | 7.50x | 7.97x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth $42,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,500 for EXE. Over the past 12 months, EQT leads with a +28.8% total return vs INR's -7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQT at 24.0% vs AR's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | +12.8% | +15.2% | +7.6% | +16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | -7.7% | +28.8% | +0.3% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | — | +90.8% | +40.5% | +56.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +185.0% | — | +247.1% | +275.6% | +323.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.4% | — | +112.1% | +63.5% | +80.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | — | +24.0% | +12.0% | +16.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQT currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs INR's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.68x | 1.02x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $126.62 | $19.90 | $62.23 | $44.02 | $43.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $91.02 | $11.13 | $43.57 | $29.10 | $30.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +83.4% | +98.7% | +83.6% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 50.6 | 60.3 | 50.5 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 153K | 8.7M | 5.0M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EXE as "Buy", INR as "Buy", EQT as "Buy", AR as "Buy", RRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for EXE (target: $138) vs -33.1% for EQT (target: $41). For income investors, EXE offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs RRC's 0.87%.
| Metric | EXEExpand Energy Cor… | INRInfinity Natural … | EQTEQT Corporation | ARAntero Resources … | RRCRange Resources C… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.80 | $20.00 | $41.11 | $44.25 | $42.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 6 | 44 | 50 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | +1.0% | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3182.59 | — | $0.64 | $0.40 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +2.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 100 | 103.96 | +4.0% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | ∞ | ∞ | NaN% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 100 | 104.93 | +4.9% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 100 | 87.66 | -12.3% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 94.58 | -5.4% |
Infinity Natural Re… (INR) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE)'s +185%. A $10,000 investment in INR 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | $7.9B | $12.1B | +54.0% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | $143M | $259M | +80.9% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | $1.9B | $8.6B | +365.4% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | $1.8B | $5.3B | +200.6% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | $1.4B | $3.1B | +128.9% |
Expand Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $7.9B (2016) to $12.1B (2025) — a 4.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -55.8% | 15.0% | +126.9% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 47.6% | 19.0% | -60.0% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | -24.4% | 26.9% | +210.3% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | -48.4% | 12.0% | +124.9% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -38.3% | 21.1% | +155.1% |
Expand Energy Corporation's net margin went from -56% (2016) to 15% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 1.2 | 14.6 | +1116.7% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | 3.9 | 14.1 | +261.5% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | 9.8 | 17 | +73.5% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 12.7 | 12.9 | +1.6% |
Expand Energy Corporation has traded in a 1x–15x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. EQT Corporation has traded in a 4x–113x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -1,278 | 7.57 | +100.6% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 1.16 | 3.72 | +220.7% |
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | -2.71 | 3.8 | +240.2% |
| Antero Resources Co… (AR) | -2.88 | 2.03 | +170.5% |
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -2.75 | 2.74 | +199.6% |
Expand Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $-1278.00 (2016) to $7.57 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Expand Energy Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+75% vs 2021). Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. generated $-78M FCF in 2024 (-156% vs 2022).
EXE vs INR vs EQT vs AR vs RRC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC a better buy right now?
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) offers the better valuation at 4.5x trailing P/E (6.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC?
On trailing P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) is the cheapest at 4.5x versus Antero Resources Corporation at 18.1x. On forward P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC?
Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +323.1%, compared to +185.0% for Expand Energy Corporation (EXE). A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth approximately $42K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXE returned +197.4% versus AR's +63.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus Infinity Natural Resources, Inc.'s 1.05β — meaning INR is approximately 113% more volatile than EXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EQT Corporation (EQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 51% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC?
EQT Corporation (EQT) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 12.0% for Antero Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQT leads at 40.8% versus 16.1% for RRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQT leads at 97.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) trades at 6.1x forward P/E versus 12.9x for EQT Corporation — 6.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXE: 27.7% to $137.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC?
In this comparison, EXE (100.0% yield), AR (1.1% yield), EQT (1.0% yield), RRC (0.9% yield) pay a dividend. INR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is EXE or INR or EQT or AR or RRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 100.0% yield, +197.4% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EXE and INR and EQT and AR and RRC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: EXE is a mid-cap deep-value stock; INR is a large-cap deep-value stock; EQT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RRC is a small-cap deep-value stock. EXE, EQT, AR, RRC pay a dividend while INR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.