Software - Infrastructure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Banks - Diversified
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $85M | $4M | $869.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $172M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-98M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 17.1% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | -48.1% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $32M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $19M | $343.34B |
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Cambium Networks Co… (CMBM) | 100 | 158.8 | +58.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FATN vs CMBM vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FATN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 133.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.17, Low D/E 22.6%, current ratio 3.85x
- 17.9% revenue growth vs CMBM's -25.8%
CMBM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs CMBM's -98.7%
- Beta 0.95, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.9% revenue growth vs CMBM's -25.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs CMBM's -57.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.8% vs CMBM's -64.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs CMBM's -44.1%, ROIC 11.9% vs -41.3% |
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FATN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14594.4x FATN's $19M. FATN is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMBM's -57.0%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $172M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$74M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$98M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$788,908 | -$24M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +17.1% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | -48.1% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | -57.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -13.9% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.5% | +1.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +64.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CMBM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 11% valuation discount to FATN's 17.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FATN's 21.7x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $4M | $869.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $17M | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.40x | -0.05x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.70x | — | 18.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 0.02x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.38x | 0.04x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FATN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FATN delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CMBM. FATN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs CMBM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | -2.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.2% | -44.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | -41.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | -40.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.39x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493,351 | $13M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $19M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $32M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | -19.20x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $27 for CMBM. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +18.8% total return vs CMBM's -64.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs CMBM's -80.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +183.3% | -91.3% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | -64.6% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -99.2% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -99.7% | +102.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.7% | +433.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -80.4% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs CMBM's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.84x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $6.80 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $0.13 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +1.9% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 28.8 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 779K | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +19.1% | +4.0% |
FATN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
FATN vs CMBM vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FATN or CMBM or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FatPipe, Inc.
Common Stock (FATN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock at 17. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -99. 7% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus CMBM's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately 129% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FatPipe, Inc.
Common Stock (FATN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus -25. 8% for Cambium Networks Corporation (CMBM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -490. 3% for Cambium Networks Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FATN leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
FatPipe, Inc.
Common Stock (FATN) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus -35. 2% for Cambium Networks Corporation — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -27. 6% for CMBM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FATN or CMBM or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FATN or CMBM or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FATN, CMBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FATN or CMBM or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +433. 9% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FATN and CMBM and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and CMBM (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMBM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while FATN, CMBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.