Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
NTCT logo
NTCT
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs NTCT vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.91B
5Y Perf.+93.5%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.35B
5Y Perf.+11.1%

FATN vs NTCT vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
NTCT logoNTCT
KO logoKO
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$85M$2.91B$342.35B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$859M$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$96M$13.70B
Gross Margin87.2%78.1%61.7%
Operating Margin18.7%12.8%29.3%
Forward P/E20.8x16.8x24.3x
Total Debt$6M$40M$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$586M$10.27B

FATN vs NTCT vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
NTCT
KO
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT)100193.5+93.5%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100111.1+11.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs NTCT vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NTCT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇NTCT emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Growth Play

FATN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 133.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
  • 17.9% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • 15.2% ROA vs NTCT's 4.2%, ROIC 11.9% vs 7.3%
Best for: growth exposure
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTCT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.07
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.85x
  • PEG 0.44 vs KO's 2.18
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 112.2% 10Y total return vs NTCT's 64.2%
  • 27.8% margin vs NTCT's 11.1%
  • 2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFATN logoFATN17.9% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueNTCT logoNTCTLower P/E (16.8x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.44 vs 2.18
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NTCT's 11.1%
Stability / SafetyNTCT logoNTCTBeta 1.07 vs FATN's 2.17, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NTCT logoNTCT+70.3% vs FATN's -24.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FATN logoFATN15.2% ROA vs NTCT's 4.2%, ROIC 11.9% vs 7.3%

FATN vs NTCT vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc.
FY 2026
Service
56.9%$489M
Product
43.1%$370M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

FATN vs NTCT vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFATN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 2565.8x FATN's $19M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTCT's 11.1%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$859M$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$169M$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$96M$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$285M$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+78.1%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%+12.8%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+11.1%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%+33.2%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%-1.0%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTCT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.4x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 44% valuation discount to NTCT's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTCT offers better value at 0.82x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$85M$2.9B$342.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86M$2.4B$377.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.40x31.28x26.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x16.85x24.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.82x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.70x14.03x25.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.45x3.38x7.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.38x1.77x10.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.18x64.64x
NTCT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NTCT and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for NTCT. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 7/9 vs FATN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+6.0%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%+4.2%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%+7.3%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+6.1%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9477
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.02x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351-$547M$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$586M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$40M$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x67.81x10.70x
Evenly matched — NTCT and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $15,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,336 for NTCT. Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +70.3% total return vs FATN's -24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KO at 12.3% vs NTCT's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+183.3%+51.4%+15.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.3%+70.3%+13.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+34.9%+41.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+33.4%+59.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.2%+112.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.5%+12.3%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.07x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$43.80$82.66
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$20.39$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+92.8%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.456.351.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M549K12.5M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", NTCT as "Hold", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.5% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -6.5% for NTCT (target: $38). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.00$86.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts12148
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%+0.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs NTCT vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or NTCT or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or NTCT or KO?

On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus NetScout Systems, Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, NetScout Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NetScout Systems, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or NTCT or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +59.

8%, compared to +33. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +112. 2% versus NTCT's +64. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FATN or NTCT or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately -1568% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FATN or NTCT or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FATN leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FATN or NTCT or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 11. 1% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 13. 0% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FATN or NTCT or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 8. 5% to $86. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or NTCT or KO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield) pays a dividend. FATN, NTCT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FATN or NTCT or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FATN and NTCT and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and NTCT (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while FATN, NTCT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.