Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AAPL | 6.4% revenue growth vs FBIO's -31.8% |
| Value | AAPL | Lower P/E (31.1x vs 342.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs FBIO's 6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | FBIO | Beta 0.65 vs AAPL's 1.28 |
| Dividends | FBIO | 1.0% yield, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FBIO | +117.8% vs AAPL's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs FBIO's 2.2%, ROIC 64.5% vs -6.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fortress Biotech is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes pharmaceutical products across multiple therapeutic areas. It generates revenue primarily through sales of its marketed dermatology products — including treatments for acne and skin conditions — supplemented by milestone payments and potential future royalties from its extensive pipeline of late-stage and early-stage drug candidates. The company's key advantage lies in its diversified portfolio approach, which spreads risk across multiple development programs while leveraging partnerships to fund research and development.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FBIO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 6991.9x FBIO's $62M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIO's 6.4%. On growth, FBIO holds the edge at +20.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$88M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.2% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.5% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.27x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 342.00x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $6 for FBIO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs FBIO's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -142.0% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.25x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $588 for FBIO. Over the past 12 months, FBIO leads with a +117.8% total return vs AAPL's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs FBIO's -33.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.1% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.8% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FBIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIO's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.53 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 729K | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIO as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". For income investors, FBIO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.98% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | 100 | 9.81 | -90.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 395.1 | +295.1% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO)'s -94%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | $16M | $58M | +250.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | -3.3% | -79.8% | -2285.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | -20.68 | -2.69 | +87.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fortress Biotech, Inc. generated $-95M FCF in 2024 (+28% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
FBIO vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIO or AAPL a better buy right now?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the better valuation at 35.4x trailing P/E (31.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIO or AAPL?
On forward P/E, Apple Inc. is actually cheaper at 31.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIO or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to -94.1% for Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus FBIO's -92.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIO or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.65β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 97% more volatile than FBIO relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — FBIO or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus -79.8% for Fortress Biotech, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus -191.4% for FBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIO leads at 63.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FBIO or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Apple Inc. (AAPL) trades at 31.1x forward P/E versus 342.0x for Fortress Biotech, Inc. — 310.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FBIO or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) offers the highest yield at 1.0%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is FBIO or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.65), 1.0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIO: -92.0%, AAPL: +1027%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FBIO and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBIO (Healthcare) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. FBIO pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.