Asset Management
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Asset Management
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $17.17B | $908.57B | $341.71B | $173.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.86B | $9.03B | $280.33B | $49.28B | $24.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $812M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $5.55B |
| Gross Margin | 51.5% | 73.8% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 50.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | 9.3% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.6x | 12.1x | 14.6x | 24.3x | 19.7x |
| Total Debt | $457M | $13.30B | $942.38B | $45.49B | $15.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $584M | $3.57B | $343.34B | $10.27B | $11.47B |
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federated Hermes, I… (FHI) | 100 | 249.2 | +149.2% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 193.0 | +93.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FHI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 36.2%, current ratio 41.26x
- Beta 0.70, yield 2.4%, current ratio 41.26x
BEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6%
- +52.1% vs BLK's +9.4%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs FHI's 144.4%
- PEG 0.83 vs BLK's 9.19
- NIM 2.2% vs FHI's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 19.7x), PEG 0.83 vs 9.19
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 27.8% margin vs BEN's 9.0%
BLK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 19.7x), PEG 0.83 vs 9.19 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs BEN's 9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs BEN's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs BLK's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 24.1% vs 4.5% |
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FHI leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • BEN leads 0 • KO leads 0 • BLK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BEN and KO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 150.7x FHI's $1.9B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEN's 9.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $9.0B | $280.3B | $49.3B | $24.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $527M | $1.2B | $81.4B | $15.5B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $812M | $57.0B | $13.7B | $5.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $938M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.5% | +73.8% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +50.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +9.3% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +9.0% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +10.4% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +100.0% | +16.0% | +18.2% | -22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FHI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FHI trades at a 68% valuation discount to BEN's 36.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs BLK's 13.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $17.2B | $908.6B | $341.7B | $173.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $26.9B | $1.51T | $376.9B | $177.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.51x | 36.32x | 16.22x | 26.12x | 29.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.56x | 12.06x | 14.60x | 24.27x | 19.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | — | 0.92x | 2.34x | 13.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.82x | 23.68x | 18.52x | 25.45x | 22.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.48x | 1.96x | 3.25x | 7.13x | 7.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.51x | 1.20x | 2.51x | 9.99x | 2.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.23x | 18.84x | 9.01x | 64.52x | 46.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for BEN. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHI scores 8/9 vs BLK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.5% | +5.6% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.2% | +2.5% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +24.1% | +1.6% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +26.3% | +2.0% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.94x | 2.60x | 1.33x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$127M | $9.7B | $599.0B | $35.2B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $584M | $3.6B | $343.3B | $10.3B | $11.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $457M | $13.3B | $942.4B | $45.5B | $15.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 44.07x | 15.19x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,555 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, BEN leads with a +52.1% total return vs BLK's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs KO's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | +40.3% | +0.8% | +16.4% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +43.1% | +52.1% | +20.9% | +17.7% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.2% | +40.7% | +138.8% | +39.3% | +61.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.8% | +25.5% | +135.5% | +65.3% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.4% | +39.9% | +481.2% | +115.0% | +248.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +12.1% | +33.7% | +11.7% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FHI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEN's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHI currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 86.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.26x | 0.87x | -0.24x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.83 | $34.17 | $338.09 | $84.04 | $1219.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.71 | $21.11 | $269.72 | $65.35 | $917.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +96.7% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 66.7 | 72.1 | 49.2 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 734K | 4.2M | 7.4M | 13.6M | 600K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BEN and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", BEN as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", BLK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for BLK (target: $1302) vs -3.2% for BEN (target: $32). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.50 | $32.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $1301.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 27 | 61 | 48 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +4.0% | +1.8% | +2.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 15 | 56 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $1.33 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $20.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.9% | +1.4% | +3.8% | +0.2% | +1.1% |
FHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FHI vs BEN vs JPM vs KO vs BLK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
On trailing P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc.
(FHI) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +25. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus BEN's +39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Franklin Resources, Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning BEN is approximately -634% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 6. 0% for Franklin Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHI leads at 29. 5% versus 6. 9% for BEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEN leads at 80. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 24. 0% to $1301. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is FHI or BEN or JPM or KO or BLK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, BEN: +39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FHI and BEN and JPM and KO and BLK?
These companies operate in different sectors (FHI (Financial Services) and BEN (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and BLK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.