Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FNWD vs FHN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FNWD vs FHN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $4.91B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $982M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 66.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 26.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $85M | $4.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $961M |
FNWD vs FHN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finward Bancorp (FNWD) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 252.4 | +152.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FHN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNWD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 48.5%, current ratio 1.77x
- Beta 0.41, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.77x
FHN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 38.2%
- 123.8% 10Y total return vs FNWD's 49.1%
- NIM 3.1% vs FNWD's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% NII/revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 12.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs FHN's 0.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs FNWD's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.9% vs FNWD's +18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FNWD's 0.6% |
FNWD vs FHN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FNWD vs FHN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 48.6x FNWD's $101M. FHN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $982M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $963M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +66.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +26.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +79.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FHN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, FHN trades at a 26% valuation discount to FNWD's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FHN's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FNWD's 26.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $214M | $16.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.08x | 13.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.75x | 11.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.34x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.25x | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FNWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FHN's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHN scores 8/9 vs FNWD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66M | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $961M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.23x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FHN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FHN five years ago would be worth $15,708 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,462 for FNWD. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +30.9% total return vs FNWD's +18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 31.9% vs FNWD's 18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | +30.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +129.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.4% | +57.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.1% | +123.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +31.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FNWD and FHN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FNWD is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FHN's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs FNWD's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.88 | $26.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.46 | $19.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
FHN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FNWD as "Buy" and FHN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.6% upside for FNWD (target: $41) vs 11.4% for FHN (target: $28). For income investors, FHN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs FNWD's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.0% |
FHN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
FNWD vs FHN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNWD or FHN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the stronger pick with 1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). First Horizon Corporation (FHN) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FHN?
On trailing P/E, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the cheapest at 13.
4x versus Finward Bancorp at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, First Horizon Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FHN?
Over the past 5 years, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) delivered a total return of +57.
1%, compared to -15. 4% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FHN returned +123. 8% versus FNWD's +49. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNWD or FHN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Finward Bancorp (FNWD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
41β versus First Horizon Corporation's 0. 97β — meaning FHN is approximately 139% more volatile than FNWD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Finward Bancorp (FNWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 50% for First Horizon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNWD or FHN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is pulling ahead at 1.
0% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for Finward Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FHN?
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 8. 0% for Finward Bancorp — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHN leads at 25. 7% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNWD or FHN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) trades at 11.
7x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Finward Bancorp — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNWD: 20. 6% to $41. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FHN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 1. 1% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD).
09Is FNWD or FHN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Finward Bancorp (FNWD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
41), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FNWD: +49. 1%, FHN: +123. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNWD and FHN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.