Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $147M | $12.47B | $355.61B | $20.26B | $9.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $4.91B | $49.28B | $11.66B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $982M | $13.70B | $2.67B | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 66.8% | 61.7% | 37.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 26.1% | 29.3% | 17.9% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 11.7x | 25.3x | 6.2x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $85M | $4.57B | $45.49B | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $961M | $10.27B | $599M | $102M |
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finward Bancorp (FNWD) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 252.4 | +152.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNWD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 48.5%, current ratio 1.77x
FHN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 123.8% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- NIM 3.1% vs FNWD's 2.8%
- +30.9% vs FIS's -49.4%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 27.8% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
- 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
- Beta 0.10 vs FHN's 0.97
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FNWD's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs FHN's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.9% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FNWD's 0.4%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.4% |
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
JKHY leads 1 • FHN leads 1 • KO leads 1 • FNWD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 487.7x FNWD's $101M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $4.9B | $49.3B | $11.7B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $1.3B | $15.5B | $4.1B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $982M | $13.7B | $2.7B | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $963M | $12.6B | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +66.8% | +61.7% | +37.6% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +26.1% | +29.3% | +17.9% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +20.0% | +27.8% | +22.9% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +19.6% | +25.5% | +23.9% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | +30.1% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +79.3% | +18.2% | +30.6% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, FHN trades at a 74% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.04x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $12.5B | $355.6B | $20.3B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $214M | $16.1B | $390.8B | $23.7B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.08x | 13.37x | 27.18x | 52.27x | 20.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.75x | 11.72x | 25.27x | 6.24x | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | 2.14x | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.34x | 12.03x | 26.39x | 6.50x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 2.50x | 7.42x | 1.90x | 3.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.36x | 10.40x | 1.46x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.25x | 13.06x | 67.15x | 7.21x | 15.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FHN scores 8/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +10.7% | +41.1% | +18.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.2% | +13.1% | +7.5% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +7.0% | +15.8% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +10.2% | +17.3% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.50x | 1.33x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66M | $3.6B | $35.2B | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $961M | $10.3B | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $4.6B | $45.5B | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.23x | 0.82x | 10.70x | 21.16x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FHN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, FHN leads with a +30.9% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 31.9% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | +5.6% | +20.3% | -38.9% | -27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | +30.9% | +17.2% | -49.4% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +129.7% | +47.0% | -18.9% | -15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.4% | +57.1% | +65.6% | -67.3% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.1% | +123.8% | +121.1% | -25.6% | +74.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +31.9% | +13.7% | -6.8% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FHN's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.97x | -0.20x | 0.61x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.88 | $26.56 | $84.04 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.46 | $19.04 | $65.35 | $37.91 | $124.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +94.7% | +98.3% | +47.4% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 61.0 | 60.6 | 30.8 | 27.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 3.9M | 12.7M | 5.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", FHN as "Hold", KO as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs FNWD's 1.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $28.00 | $86.13 | $62.88 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 35 | 48 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.5% | +2.5% | +4.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 56 | 1 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.63 | $2.04 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.0% | +0.2% | +7.0% | +0.4% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). JKHY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FNWD vs FHN vs KO vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). First Horizon Corporation (FHN) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the cheapest at 13.
4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.
6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FHN returned +123. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus First Horizon Corporation's 0. 97β — meaning FHN is approximately -585% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD).
09Is FNWD or FHN or KO or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FHN: +123. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNWD and FHN and KO and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (FNWD (Financial Services) and FHN (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.