Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $20.26B | $9.28B | $201M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $11.66B | $2.52B | $125M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $2.67B | $519M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 65.6% | 37.6% | 44.1% | 41.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.0% | 17.9% | 26.0% | 17.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 6.2x | 18.7x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $85M | $4.01B | $0.00 | $122M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $599M | $102M | $259M |
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finward Bancorp (FNWD) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
| CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) | 100 | 299.7 | +199.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNWD is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.8% vs CFBK's 2.6%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs JKHY's 1.86
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 8.6x)
- 22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
- 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
CFBK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 338.2% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 74.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 66.1%, current ratio 15.31x
- +32.4% vs FIS's -49.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs FIS's 0.61 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FNWD's 0.4%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.4% |
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
JKHY leads 1 • CFBK leads 1 • FNWD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 115.4x FNWD's $101M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $11.7B | $2.5B | $125M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $13M | $4.1B | $810M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $2.7B | $519M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $2.8B | $728M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.6% | +37.6% | +44.1% | +41.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +17.9% | +26.0% | +17.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +22.9% | +20.6% | +13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +23.9% | +28.9% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.1% | +8.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.1% | +30.6% | +12.5% | +29.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FNWD and FIS and CFBK each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, CFBK trades at a 78% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.04x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $20.3B | $9.3B | $201M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $214M | $23.7B | $9.2B | $64M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.08x | 52.27x | 20.55x | 11.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.75x | 6.24x | 18.72x | 8.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.14x | 2.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.34x | 6.50x | 11.87x | 2.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.46x | 1.90x | 3.91x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.46x | 4.40x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.25x | 7.21x | 15.78x | 11.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFBK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFBK scores 7/9 vs JKHY's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +18.4% | +24.0% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +7.5% | +17.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +6.0% | +21.0% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +6.6% | +22.7% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.29x | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $66M | $3.4B | -$102M | -$137M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $599M | $102M | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $85M | $4.0B | $0 | $122M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.23x | 21.16x | 122.37x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFBK five years ago would be worth $16,516 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CFBK leads with a +32.4% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFBK at 25.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.2% | -38.9% | -27.4% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | -49.4% | -27.5% | +32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | -18.9% | -15.1% | +98.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.4% | -67.3% | -14.9% | +65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.1% | -25.6% | +74.8% | +338.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | -6.8% | -5.3% | +25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and CFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIS's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFBK currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 0.61x | 0.10x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.88 | $82.74 | $193.39 | $34.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.46 | $37.91 | $124.63 | $22.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.2% | +47.4% | +66.3% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 30.8 | 27.5 | 69.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 5.6M | 1.2M | 35K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", CFBK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -7.2% for CFBK (target: $29). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs CFBK's 0.98%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $62.88 | $194.63 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 37 | 22 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +4.2% | +1.8% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 22 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $1.63 | $2.25 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.0% | +0.4% | +0.6% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). JKHY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FNWD vs FIS vs JKHY vs CFBK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
On trailing P/E, CF Bankshares Inc.
(CFBK) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
Over the past 5 years, CF Bankshares Inc.
(CFBK) delivered a total return of +65. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFBK returned +338. 2% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning FIS is approximately 487% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 66% for CF Bankshares Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CF Bankshares Inc. grew EPS 30. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JKHY leads at 23. 9% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNWD leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 0% for CF Bankshares Inc. (CFBK).
09Is FNWD or FIS or JKHY or CFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNWD and FIS and JKHY and CFBK?
These companies operate in different sectors (FNWD (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and CFBK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFBK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.