Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FNWD logo
FNWD
FIS logo
FIS
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
JKHY logo
JKHY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FNWD
Finward Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+3.6%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$422.78B
5Y Perf.+135.9%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.28B
5Y Perf.-30.3%

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FNWD logoFNWD
FIS logoFIS
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
JKHY logoJKHY
IndustryBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$147M$20.26B$896.00B$422.78B$9.28B
Revenue (TTM)$101M$11.66B$280.33B$191.57B$2.52B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$2.67B$57.05B$30.51B$519M
Gross Margin65.6%37.6%60.0%56.1%44.1%
Operating Margin8.0%17.9%25.9%19.7%26.0%
Forward P/E12.8x6.2x14.4x12.6x18.7x
Total Debt$85M$4.01B$942.38B$365.90B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$18M$599M$343.34B$231.84B$102M

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FNWD
FIS
JPM
BAC
JKHY
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Finward Bancorp (FNWD)100103.6+3.6%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100235.9+135.9%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10069.7-30.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS and JKHY are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BAC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FNWD
Finward Bancorp
The Banking Pick

FNWD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 48.5%, current ratio 1.77x
  • NIM 2.8% vs BAC's 1.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs JKHY's 1.86
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86
  • 22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BAC's 368.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +28.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.10, yield 1.8%
  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
  • 7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJKHY logoJKHY7.2% revenue growth vs FNWD's -9.6%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs FNWD's 8.0%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.10 vs JPM's 0.94
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)BAC logoBAC+28.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs FNWD's 0.4%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.4%

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FNWDFinward Bancorp

Segment breakdown not available.

FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGBAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2773.9x FNWD's $101M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNWD's 8.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$101M$11.7B$280.3B$191.6B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$13M$4.1B$81.4B$40.0B$810M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$2.7B$57.0B$30.5B$519M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$2.8B$100.9B$12.6B$728M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.6%+37.6%+60.0%+56.1%+44.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.0%+17.9%+25.9%+19.7%+26.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+8.0%+22.9%+20.4%+15.9%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.6%+23.9%+36.0%+6.6%+28.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.1%+30.6%+16.0%+18.3%+12.5%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 72% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Market CapShares × price$147M$20.3B$896.0B$422.8B$9.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$214M$23.7B$1.50T$556.8B$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.08x52.27x16.00x14.66x20.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.75x6.24x14.40x12.56x18.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.14x0.90x0.95x2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.34x6.50x18.36x13.92x11.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.46x1.90x3.20x2.21x3.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.84x1.46x2.47x1.39x4.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.25x7.21x8.88x33.52x15.78x
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $5 for FNWD. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.0%+18.4%+15.9%+10.1%+24.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+7.5%+1.3%+0.9%+17.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+6.0%+4.5%+3.5%+21.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.3%+6.6%+8.9%+4.5%+22.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.29x2.60x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$66M$3.4B$599.0B$134.1B-$102M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18M$599M$343.3B$231.8B$102M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$85M$4.0B$942.4B$365.9B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.23x21.16x0.74x0.48x122.37x
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +28.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.2%-38.9%-0.5%+1.1%-27.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.7%-49.4%+21.8%+28.1%-27.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+68.0%-18.9%+138.2%+103.0%-15.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.4%-67.3%+118.2%+47.1%-14.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.1%-25.6%+465.8%+368.2%+74.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.9%-6.8%+33.6%+26.6%-5.3%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BAC and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x0.61x0.94x0.86x0.10x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.88$82.74$337.25$57.55$193.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$26.46$37.91$262.71$43.66$124.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.2%+47.4%+95.1%+97.3%+66.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.530.859.168.327.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K5.6M7.0M31.7M1.2M
Evenly matched — BAC and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FNWD as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs FNWD's 1.07%.

MetricFNWD logoFNWDFinward BancorpFIS logoFISFidelity National…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$41.00$62.88$339.75$61.13$194.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts237615422
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+4.2%+1.9%+2.3%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01151222
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.36$1.63$5.95$1.27$2.25
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+7.0%+3.9%+5.1%+0.4%
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JKHY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FNWD vs FIS vs JPM vs BAC vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Finward Bancorp (FNWD) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

7x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 812% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 6% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 8. 0% for FNWD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNWD leads at 65. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 1. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Finward Bancorp (FNWD).

09

Is FNWD or FIS or JPM or BAC or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FNWD and FIS and JPM and BAC and JKHY?

These companies operate in different sectors (FNWD (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FNWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.