Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FORA logo
FORA
CSGP logo
CSGP
Z logo
Z
INFU logo
INFU
OPEN logo
OPEN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FORA
Forian Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$68M
5Y Perf.-78.5%
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$12.77B
5Y Perf.-57.9%
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.72B
5Y Perf.-65.8%
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$190M
5Y Perf.-50.2%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.43B
5Y Perf.-74.6%

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FORA logoFORA
CSGP logoCSGP
Z logoZ
INFU logoINFU
OPEN logoOPEN
IndustryMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesReal Estate - ServicesInternet Content & InformationMedical - Instruments & SuppliesReal Estate - Services
Market Cap$68M$12.77B$7.72B$190M$3.43B
Revenue (TTM)$30M$3.41B$2.69B$142M$3.94B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$25M$61M$8M$-1.39B
Gross Margin46.8%77.4%73.3%56.7%7.9%
Operating Margin-13.4%-0.8%0.4%9.1%-9.9%
Forward P/E22.1x14.1x22.2x
Total Debt$12K$1.14B$536M$3M$193M
Cash & Equiv.$13M$1.73B$773M$3M$962M

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FORA
CSGP
Z
INFU
OPEN
StockMar 21May 26Return
Forian Inc. (FORA)10021.5-78.5%
CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP)10042.1-57.9%
Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z)10034.2-65.8%
InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU)10049.8-50.2%
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10025.4-74.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FORA and INFU are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Z and OPEN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FORA
Forian Inc.
The Income Pick

FORA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.21
  • Rev growth 50.1%, EPS growth 23.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.97x
  • Beta 0.21, current ratio 2.97x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CSGP
CoStar Group, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, CSGP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C
The Value Play

Z ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 22.2x)
Best for: value
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INFU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 240.1% 10Y total return vs CSGP's 43.4%
  • 5.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
  • 7.9% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 12.5% vs -15.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +6.7% vs CSGP's -62.1%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFORA logoFORA50.1% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
ValueZ logoZLower P/E (14.1x vs 22.2x)
Quality / MarginsINFU logoINFU5.6% margin vs OPEN's -35.2%
Stability / SafetyFORA logoFORABeta 0.21 vs OPEN's 3.14, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+6.7% vs CSGP's -62.1%
Efficiency (ROA)INFU logoINFU7.9% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 12.5% vs -15.8%

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FORAForian Inc.
FY 2022
Information and Software
93.5%$26M
Service
5.5%$2M
Product and Service, Other
1.0%$274,256
CSGPCoStar Group, Inc.
FY 2024
CoStar Suite
61.1%$1.0B
LoopNet
16.9%$282M
Information services
8.1%$136M
Online Marketplaces
7.8%$130M
Residential
6.0%$101M
ZZillow Group, Inc. Class C
FY 2025
Sales Revenue
44.9%$1.9B
Residential Revenue
40.2%$1.7B
Rental Revenue
14.9%$630M
INFUInfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Patient Services
57.4%$87M
Device Solutions
42.6%$64M
OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINFULAGGINGZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INFU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 131.0x FORA's $30M. INFU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, CSGP holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$30M$3.4B$2.7B$142M$3.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$278M$221M$26M-$363M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$25M$61M$8M-$1.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$241M$431M$20M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.8%+77.4%+73.3%+56.7%+7.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.4%-0.8%+0.4%+9.1%-9.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.0%+0.7%+2.3%+5.6%-35.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.8%+7.1%+16.0%+14.3%+27.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.9%+22.5%+18.4%-3.0%-37.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%+127.7%+5.1%+5.9%-50.0%
INFU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OPEN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 30.4x trailing earnings, INFU trades at a 98% valuation discount to CSGP's 1814.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INFU's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSGP's 71.6x.

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Market CapShares × price$68M$12.8B$7.7B$190M$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$55M$12.2B$7.5B$190M$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-23.48x1814.46x354.81x30.39x-2.63x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.11x14.10x22.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple71.63x28.65x7.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.24x3.93x2.99x1.33x0.78x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.27x1.52x1.67x3.47x3.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.49x311.35x32.83x7.97x3.30x
OPEN leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INFU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

INFU delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. FORA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPEN's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-17.2%+0.3%+1.3%+14.0%-163.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.8%+0.2%+1.1%+7.9%-53.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.5%-0.9%-0.5%+12.5%-15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.2%-0.8%-0.6%+14.3%-11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965785
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.14x0.11x0.06x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M-$589M-$237M$241,000-$769M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$13M$1.7B$773M$3M$962M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12,137$1.1B$536M$3M$193M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-48.78x1.58x5.22x15.54x-8.92x
INFU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — INFU and OPEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in INFU five years ago would be worth $4,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,735 for FORA. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +671.4% total return vs CSGP's -62.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 13.3% vs CSGP's -29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.4%-54.1%-51.3%+12.3%-26.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+2.4%-62.1%-52.5%+52.2%+671.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.3%-64.7%-32.9%-7.6%+45.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.7%-65.7%-72.3%-50.2%-73.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.5%+43.4%-7.6%+240.1%-58.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-2.5%-29.3%-12.5%-2.6%+13.3%
Evenly matched — INFU and OPEN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FORA and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FORA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INFU currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs CSGP's 30.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.21x0.45x1.15x1.22x3.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.71$97.43$93.88$11.04$10.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.64$29.53$31.48$5.38$0.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+80.1%+30.9%+34.2%+85.3%+41.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.831.031.141.544.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded40K7.0M4.0M172K36.8M
Evenly matched — FORA and INFU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CSGP as "Buy", Z as "Hold", INFU as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 111.0% upside for Z (target: $68) vs 38.0% for OPEN (target: $6).

MetricFORA logoFORAForian Inc.CSGP logoCSGPCoStar Group, Inc.Z logoZZillow Group, Inc…INFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$61.18$67.75$15.00$6.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts2546326
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+4.5%+8.7%+5.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INFU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OPEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallInfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FORA vs CSGP vs Z vs INFU vs OPEN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Forian Inc.

(FORA) is the stronger pick with 50. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) offers the better valuation at 30. 4x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

On trailing P/E, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) is the cheapest at 30. 4x versus CoStar Group, Inc. at 1814. 5x. On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

Over the past 5 years, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) delivered a total return of -50. 2%, compared to -82. 7% for Forian Inc. (FORA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INFU returned +240. 1% versus FORA's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Forian Inc.

(FORA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 14β — meaning OPEN is approximately 1397% more volatile than FORA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forian Inc. (FORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 19% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Forian Inc.

(FORA) is pulling ahead at 50. 1% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INFU leads at 8. 3% versus -8. 2% for FORA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSGP leads at 75. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C (Z) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for Z: 111. 0% to $67. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FORA or CSGP or Z or INFU or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Forian Inc.

(FORA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORA: -90. 5%, OPEN: -58. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FORA and CSGP and Z and INFU and OPEN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FORA (Healthcare) and CSGP (Real Estate) and Z (Communication Services) and INFU (Healthcare) and OPEN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FORA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CSGP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; Z is a small-cap high-growth stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.