Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
REIT - Residential
Medical - Care Facilities
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | REIT - Residential | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $68M | $190M | $280M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $142M | $98M | $1.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $8M | $-12M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 56.7% | 41.5% | 13.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.4% | 9.1% | 12.4% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | — | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $12K | $3M | $508M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $3M | $25M | $161M |
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forian Inc. (FORA) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Healthcare Services… (HCSG) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FORA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 50.1%, EPS growth 23.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.97x
- Beta 0.21, current ratio 2.97x
- 50.1% revenue growth vs BRT's 1.5%
INFU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 5.6% margin vs FORA's -17.0%
- 7.9% ROA vs FORA's -11.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs -7.5%
BRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 221.6% 10Y total return vs INFU's 240.1%
- 7.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
HCSG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 1.08
- Better valuation composite
- +58.9% vs BRT's -0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.1% revenue growth vs BRT's 1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.6% margin vs FORA's -17.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs INFU's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.9% vs BRT's -0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs FORA's -11.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs -7.5% |
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INFU leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCSG leads 2 • FORA leads 0 • BRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 61.1x FORA's $30M. INFU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FORA's -17.0%. On growth, HCSG holds the edge at +6.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $142M | $98M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $26M | $39M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $8M | -$12M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $20M | $12M | $139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.8% | +56.7% | +41.5% | +13.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +9.1% | +12.4% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +5.6% | -12.5% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +14.3% | +12.7% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -3.0% | +4.2% | +6.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +5.9% | -16.7% | +175.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INFU and HCSG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.3x trailing earnings, HCSG trades at a 7% valuation discount to INFU's 30.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INFU's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCSG's 23.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $190M | $280M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $190M | $763M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.48x | 30.39x | -22.56x | 28.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.16x | — | 21.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.55x | 20.41x | 23.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.24x | 1.33x | 2.89x | 0.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 3.47x | 1.51x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.49x | 7.97x | 42.18x | 11.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-17 for FORA. FORA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.2% | +14.0% | -6.8% | +11.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +7.9% | -1.7% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.5% | +12.5% | +1.3% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | +14.3% | +1.6% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.06x | 2.87x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $241,000 | $483M | -$136M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $3M | $25M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12,137 | $3M | $508M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.78x | 15.54x | 0.51x | 33.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCSG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BRT five years ago would be worth $11,314 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,735 for FORA. Over the past 12 months, HCSG leads with a +58.9% total return vs BRT's -0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCSG at 17.3% vs BRT's -3.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +12.3% | +4.7% | +32.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.4% | +52.2% | -0.2% | +58.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -7.6% | -11.2% | +61.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.7% | -50.2% | +13.1% | -23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +240.1% | +221.6% | -29.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | -2.6% | -3.9% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FORA and HCSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FORA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INFU's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCSG currently trades 94.1% from its 52-week high vs FORA's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.22x | 0.45x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.71 | $11.04 | $16.69 | $24.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $5.38 | $13.18 | $12.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +85.3% | +89.2% | +94.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 41.5 | 52.6 | 63.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 172K | 32K | 638K |
Analyst Outlook
HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INFU as "Buy", BRT as "Buy", HCSG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 59.2% upside for INFU (target: $15) vs 6.8% for HCSG (target: $25). BRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $21.00 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 5 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +7.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.05 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +5.8% | +1.8% | +3.7% |
INFU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HCSG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
FORA vs INFU vs BRT vs HCSG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Forian Inc.
(FORA) is the stronger pick with 50. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
On trailing P/E, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
(HCSG) is the cheapest at 28. 3x versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. at 30. 4x. On forward P/E, Healthcare Services Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
Over the past 5 years, BRT Apartments Corp.
(BRT) delivered a total return of +13. 1%, compared to -82. 7% for Forian Inc. (FORA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INFU returned +240. 1% versus FORA's -90. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Forian Inc.
(FORA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning INFU is approximately 480% more volatile than FORA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forian Inc. (FORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Forian Inc.
(FORA) is pulling ahead at 50. 1% versus 1. 5% for BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to -26. 9% for BRT Apartments Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -12. 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRT leads at 11. 4% versus -8. 2% for FORA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INFU leads at 56. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
(HCSG) trades at 21. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INFU: 59. 2% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG?
In this comparison, BRT (7.
0% yield) pays a dividend. FORA, INFU, HCSG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FORA or INFU or BRT or HCSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRT Apartments Corp.
(BRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 7. 0% yield, +221. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRT: +221. 6%, HCSG: -29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FORA and INFU and BRT and HCSG?
These companies operate in different sectors (FORA (Healthcare) and INFU (Healthcare) and BRT (Real Estate) and HCSG (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FORA is a small-cap high-growth stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HCSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRT pays a dividend while FORA, INFU, HCSG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.