Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Banks - Diversified
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $68M | $190M | $129M | $93M | $1.78B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30M | $142M | $302M | $107M | $1.23B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $8M | $-265M | $7M | $20M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 56.7% | 46.0% | 69.0% | 43.5% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -13.4% | 9.1% | -19.2% | 13.6% | 2.7% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 44.8x | 5.3x | 20.2x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $12K | $3M | $171M | $26M | $204M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $3M | $51M | $23M | $197M | $343.34B |
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forian Inc. (FORA) | 100 | 21.5 | -78.5% |
| InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU) | 100 | 49.8 | -50.2% |
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 205.8 | +105.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FORA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 50.1%, EPS growth 23.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 2.97x
- Beta 0.21, current ratio 2.97x
- 50.1% revenue growth vs HCAT's 1.5%
INFU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +52.2% vs OPRX's -62.0%
- 7.9% ROA vs HCAT's -50.1%, ROIC 12.5% vs -6.1%
Among these 6 stocks, HCAT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.3x vs 14.6x)
OMCL doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs INFU's 240.1%
- 20.4% margin vs HCAT's -87.7%
- 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.1% revenue growth vs HCAT's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.3x vs 14.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs HCAT's -87.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs OPRX's 2.16, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.2% vs OPRX's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs HCAT's -50.1%, ROIC 12.5% vs -6.1% |
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
OPRX leads 1 • INFU leads 1 • FORA leads 0 • HCAT leads 0 • OMCL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 9328.3x FORA's $30M. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCAT's -87.7%. On growth, OMCL holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30M | $142M | $302M | $107M | $1.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $26M | -$8M | $19M | $111M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | $8M | -$265M | $7M | $20M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $20M | $9M | $14M | $112M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.8% | +56.7% | +46.0% | +69.0% | +43.5% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.4% | +9.1% | -19.2% | +13.6% | +2.7% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +5.6% | -87.7% | +6.4% | +1.7% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +14.3% | +3.0% | +13.4% | +9.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | -3.0% | -10.9% | -9.5% | +14.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +5.9% | -3.4% | +78.0% | +2.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 98% valuation discount to OMCL's 881.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OMCL's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $190M | $129M | $93M | $1.8B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55M | $190M | $249M | $96M | $1.8B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.48x | 30.39x | -0.68x | 18.44x | 881.49x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.16x | 44.85x | 5.29x | 20.15x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.55x | 17.30x | 5.87x | 21.25x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.24x | 1.33x | 0.41x | 0.85x | 1.50x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 3.47x | 0.49x | 0.74x | 1.47x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.49x | 7.97x | — | 5.01x | 20.44x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-100 for HCAT. FORA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.2% | +14.0% | -99.8% | +5.5% | +1.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.8% | +7.9% | -50.1% | +4.0% | +1.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.5% | +12.5% | -6.1% | +6.8% | +0.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | +14.3% | -7.6% | +7.8% | +0.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.06x | 0.70x | 0.20x | 0.17x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | $241,000 | $120M | $3M | $8M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $3M | $51M | $23M | $197M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12,137 | $3M | $171M | $26M | $204M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -48.78x | 15.54x | -6.62x | 2.84x | 18.41x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $319 for HCAT. Over the past 12 months, INFU leads with a +52.2% total return vs OPRX's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs HCAT's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +12.3% | -23.7% | -59.9% | -13.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.4% | +52.2% | -52.3% | -62.0% | +38.1% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.3% | -7.6% | -85.9% | -66.2% | -46.8% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.7% | -50.2% | -96.8% | -90.4% | -72.8% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.5% | +240.1% | -95.6% | +53.7% | +17.2% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | -2.6% | -48.0% | -30.4% | -19.0% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FORA and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FORA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs OPRX's 22.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 1.22x | 1.63x | 2.16x | 1.18x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.71 | $11.04 | $4.13 | $22.25 | $55.00 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $5.38 | $0.96 | $4.57 | $26.85 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.1% | +85.3% | +42.1% | +22.4% | +71.0% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 41.5 | 59.5 | 43.1 | 39.6 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 172K | 1.4M | 437K | 576K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INFU as "Buy", HCAT as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", OMCL as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 241.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $2.25 | $17.00 | $57.20 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 22 | 15 | 19 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +5.8% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +3.8% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). OPRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FORA vs INFU vs HCAT vs OPRX vs OMCL vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Forian Inc.
(FORA) is the stronger pick with 50. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Omnicell, Inc. at 881. 5x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -96. 8% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus HCAT's -95. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Forian Inc.
(FORA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 16β — meaning OPRX is approximately 929% more volatile than FORA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forian Inc. (FORA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Forian Inc.
(FORA) is pulling ahead at 50. 1% versus 1. 5% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to -121. 7% for Health Catalyst, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FORA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -11. 6% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPRX leads at 63. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 5.
3x forward P/E versus 44. 8x for Health Catalyst, Inc. — 39. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 241. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FORA, INFU, HCAT, OPRX, OMCL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FORA or INFU or HCAT or OPRX or OMCL or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, OPRX: +53. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FORA and INFU and HCAT and OPRX and OMCL and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FORA (Healthcare) and INFU (Healthcare) and HCAT (Healthcare) and OPRX (Healthcare) and OMCL (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FORA is a small-cap high-growth stock; INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while FORA, INFU, HCAT, OPRX, OMCL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.