Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FVCB logo
FVCB
CZWI logo
CZWI
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FVCB
FVCBankcorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.+95.0%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FVCB logoFVCB
CZWI logoCZWI
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$302M$207M$355.61B$896.00B$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$120M$90M$49.28B$280.33B$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$22M$14M$13.70B$57.05B$2.67B
Gross Margin53.1%54.7%61.7%60.0%37.6%
Operating Margin23.6%7.0%29.3%25.9%17.9%
Forward P/E11.4x11.8x25.3x14.4x6.2x
Total Debt$25M$52M$45.49B$942.38B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$119M$10.27B$343.34B$599M

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FVCB
CZWI
KO
JPM
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB)100195.0+95.0%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CZWI and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FIS and FVCB also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FVCB
FVCBankcorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FVCB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 47.6%
  • 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 1.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • NIM 2.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Pick

FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFVCB logoFVCB9.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyCZWI logoCZWIBeta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)CZWI logoCZWI+52.1% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
71.4%$1M
Fees Exchange And Other Service Charges
28.6%$500,000
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$120M$90M$49.3B$280.3B$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$29M$9M$15.5B$81.4B$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$14M$13.7B$57.0B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$24M$11M$12.6B$100.9B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+53.1%+54.7%+61.7%+60.0%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.6%+7.0%+29.3%+25.9%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+16.0%+27.8%+20.4%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.9%+12.4%+25.5%+36.0%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.8%+63.0%+18.2%+16.0%+30.6%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.9x trailing earnings, FVCB trades at a 73% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$302M$207M$355.6B$896.0B$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$321M$140M$390.8B$1.50T$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.88x14.70x27.18x16.00x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.38x11.79x25.27x14.40x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.11x2.90x2.43x0.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x15.69x26.39x18.36x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x2.29x7.42x3.20x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x1.11x10.40x2.47x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.65x19.90x67.15x8.88x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. FVCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FVCB scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.9%+7.8%+41.1%+15.9%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+0.8%+13.1%+1.3%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.2%+2.0%+15.8%+4.5%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.9%+0.6%+17.3%+8.9%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–996756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.28x1.33x2.60x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$20M-$67M$35.2B$599.0B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$119M$10.3B$343.3B$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25M$52M$45.5B$942.4B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.52x0.16x10.70x0.74x21.16x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+21.2%+24.3%+20.3%-0.5%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+49.1%+52.1%+17.2%+21.8%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.8%+153.7%+47.0%+138.2%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.2%+69.0%+65.6%+118.2%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+84.8%+149.0%+121.1%+465.8%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%+36.4%+13.7%+33.6%-6.8%
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.50x-0.20x0.94x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.41$22.62$84.04$337.25$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.13$12.83$65.35$262.71$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+94.9%+98.3%+95.1%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10069.051.260.659.130.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded205K41K12.7M7.0M5.6M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FVCB as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs FVCB's 0.71%.

MetricFVCB logoFVCBFVCBankcorp, Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$19.00$86.13$339.75$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts32486137
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+1.7%+2.5%+1.9%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1656151
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$0.37$2.04$5.95$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+3.0%+0.2%+3.9%+7.0%
Evenly matched — KO and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FVCB vs CZWI vs KO vs JPM vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

On trailing P/E, FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FVCBankcorp, Inc.

(FVCB) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FVCBankcorp, Inc. grew EPS 47. 6% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for FVCBankcorp, Inc. (FVCB).

09

Is FVCB or CZWI or KO or JPM or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FVCB and CZWI and KO and JPM and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (FVCB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FVCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.