Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Formula One Group (FWONK) vs TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKO | 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% |
| Value | TKO | Lower P/E (37.2x vs 52.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | FWONK | 43.8% net margin vs TKO's 4.1% |
| Stability / Safety | FWONK | Beta 0.51 vs TKO's 0.75 |
| Dividends | TKO | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; FWONK pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TKO | +50.1% vs FWONK's -5.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FWONK | 42.6% ROA vs TKO's 1.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Formula One Group is the commercial rights holder for the global Formula 1 motorsport championship. It generates revenue primarily from race promotion fees (about 30%), media rights sales (about 35%), and sponsorship deals (about 20%), with the remainder from hospitality and other sources. Its key moat is the exclusive, long-term commercial rights to the world's premier motorsport series — a globally recognized brand with high barriers to entry.
TKO Group Holdings is a sports and entertainment company that operates major professional wrestling promotions including WWE and UFC. It generates revenue primarily from media rights deals and content distribution (~60%), live event ticket sales and merchandise (~25%), and sponsorships and advertising (~15%). The company's moat lies in its ownership of iconic, globally recognized wrestling and mixed martial arts brands with decades of fan loyalty and extensive content libraries.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TKO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). FWONK leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 4.6x FWONK's $1.0B. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TKO's 4.1%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +61.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $231M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $449M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $279M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +17.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +26.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +61.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -144.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.4B | $26.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.4B | $29.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 99.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 52.13x | 37.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 83.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.48x | 20.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TKO scores 5/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.35x | 8.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $44,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,766 for FWONK. Over the past 12 months, TKO leads with a +50.1% total return vs FWONK's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TKO at 40.0% vs FWONK's 11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | +50.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.1% | +174.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.7% | +340.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.5% | +1297.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | +40.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKO's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TKO currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs FWONK's 83.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.36 | $226.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $75.26 | $133.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 717K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FWONK as "Buy" and TKO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for FWONK (target: $119) vs 4.5% for TKO (target: $234). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FWONKFormula One Group | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $119.25 | $233.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 230.02 | +130.0% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 432.53 | +332.5% |
TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) returned +341% over 5 years vs Formula One Group (FWONK)'s +108%. A $10,000 investment in TKO 5 years ago would be worth $44,052 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | $729M | $4.7B | +549.3% |
Formula One Group's revenue grew from $0M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a 0.0% CAGR. TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $729M (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 23.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 14.3% | -0.8% | -105.7% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 4.6% | 11.3% | +142.5% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 27.8 | 101.8 | +266.2% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 72.8 | 92.5 | +27.1% |
Formula One Group has traded in a 27x–102x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~102x. TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 15x–93x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~99x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 1.02 | 0 | -100.0% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 0.44 | 2.26 | +413.6% |
Formula One Group's EPS grew from $1.02 (2016) to $0.00 (2025) — a -100% CAGR. TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $2.26 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Formula One Group generated $908M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+823% vs 2021).
FWONK vs TKO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FWONK or TKO a better buy right now?
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 99.1x trailing P/E (37.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Formula One Group (FWONK) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FWONK or TKO?
On forward P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FWONK or TKO?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) delivered a total return of +340.5%, compared to +107.7% for Formula One Group (FWONK). A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1297% versus FWONK's +269.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FWONK or TKO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.51β versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s 0.75β — meaning TKO is approximately 48% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — FWONK or TKO?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.8% net margin versus 11.3% for TKO Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 17.6% versus -3.4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FWONK leads at -18.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FWONK or TKO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) trades at 37.2x forward P/E versus 52.1x for Formula One Group — 15.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWONK: 30.2% to $119.25.
07Which pays a better dividend — FWONK or TKO?
In this comparison, TKO (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. FWONK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FWONK or TKO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.75), +1297% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1297%, FWONK: +269.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FWONK and TKO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 30%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%