Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $113.20B | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $12.26B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $4.34B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | 86.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -345.2% | 39.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.1x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $3.88B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $5.09B | $343.34B |
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monte Rosa Therapeu… (GLUE) | 100 | 75.3 | -24.7% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 201.5 | +101.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GLUE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 63.5%, EPS growth 53.1%
- 63.5% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3%
- +238.6% vs VRTX's -1.6%
VRTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.67
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 20.8%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.90x
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 391.5%
- PEG 1.08 vs VRTX's 2.78
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 23.1x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.78
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 63.5% revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 23.1x), PEG 1.08 vs 2.78 | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs GLUE's -302.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs GLUE's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +238.6% vs VRTX's -1.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs GLUE's -25.9%, ROIC 23.0% vs -44.2% |
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 6526.5x GLUE's $43M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GLUE's -3.0%. On growth, VRTX holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $12.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$140M | $4.9B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $4.3B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $3.7B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | +86.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +39.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +35.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -45.8% | +30.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -95.0% | +7.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +61.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 46% valuation discount to VRTX's 29.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.20x vs VRTX's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $113.2B | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $112.0B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.17x | 29.05x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.05x | 14.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.51x | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.54x | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.00x | 9.38x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.10x | 6.15x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.44x | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX delivers a 23.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-41 for GLUE. GLUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLUE scores 6/9 vs VRTX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.0% | +23.9% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | +17.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -44.2% | +23.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | +23.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.21x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | -$1.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $5.1B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $3.9B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 488.09x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLUE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $23,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,074 for GLUE. Over the past 12 months, GLUE leads with a +238.6% total return vs VRTX's -1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLUE at 35.7% vs VRTX's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | -1.6% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +238.6% | -1.6% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.6% | +30.7% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +130.6% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | +391.5% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +9.3% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VRTX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VRTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLUE's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs GLUE's 66.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 0.67x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.77 | $507.92 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.12 | $362.50 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.4% | +87.6% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.4 | 48.1 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 818K | 1.1M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLUE as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 85.7% upside for GLUE (target: $32) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.75 | $553.93 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 56 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | +3.9% |
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GLUE vs VRTX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GLUE or VRTX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is the stronger pick with 63. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +130.
6%, compared to -19. 3% for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus GLUE's -19. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning GLUE is approximately 93% more volatile than VRTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. (GLUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc.
(GLUE) is pulling ahead at 63. 5% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -31. 2% for Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -43. 8% for GLUE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLUE leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GLUE or VRTX or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 08x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 78x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 9. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLUE: 85. 7% to $31. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — GLUE or VRTX or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. GLUE, VRTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GLUE or VRTX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, GLUE: -19. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GLUE and VRTX and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (GLUE (Healthcare) and VRTX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GLUE is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while GLUE, VRTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.